General Assembly Resolutions
Since the rise of the World Assembly from the ashes of its predecessor, the Bureaucracy That Cannot Be Named, WA member nations have worked tirelessly to improve the standard of the world. That, or tried to force other nations to be more like them. But that's just semantics.
Below is every World Assembly resolution ever passed.
View: All | Historical | General Assembly | Security Council
«12. . .148149150151152153»
General Assembly Resolution # 751
Repeal: “Cannibalism Act”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #691 “Cannibalism Act” (Category: Moral Decency; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The World Assembly,
Hereby expresses, in its opinion:
Horrified that the practice of cannibalism puts WA states at risk of major public health crises, due to incurable and fatal neurodegenerative disorders deriving from cannibalism affecting sapient species, such as humans, that are very hard to detect based on technologies common across the multiverse, have devastating effects on the physical and mental ability of infected, and inevitably terminal for sapient individuals affected;
Even more terrified by the idea that the target resolution allows "person-sourced meat" to be sourced from those granting "the affirmative and notarised written consent of every person from whom it was produced", which neglects that, due to WA laws on legal competence (GA299), allow the ghastly situation of legal parents or guardians granting consent to themselves to eat their own children without their children's consent;
Noting that consent to be consumed should be able to be withdrawn at any time but that humans near death may not be able to rescind such so-called affirmative and notarised consent, such as the lack of access to a notary, the cost of a notary, or through their own substantial health issues;
Convinced that the collective benefits of avoiding horrible, painful deaths from consuming, even if inadvertently, food derived from cannibalism all WA states multiverse outweigh the minor infringement of autonomy on the part of the dead or the living, or the failure to satisfy the culinary preferences of a tiny portion of the populace;
Flummoxed that the said resolution's blocker in clause 6 means that humans can be force-fed meat from other humans under some circumstances, against the consent of the consumer;
Noting that an outright ban on cannibalism across WA states is not possible because of the blocker in clause 6 of the target resolution, where the WA "disclaims all authority to impose additional restrictions on cannibalism or person-sourced meat";
Urging the World Assembly to give careful as to whether a replacement is even necessary in the first place, and, if deemed so, to vote in favor of an outright ban on cannibalism;
Hereby repeals GA691, Cannibalism Act.
Passed: |
For: | 8,852 | 73.9% |
Against: | 3,124 | 26.1% |
General Assembly Resolution # 752
Civilian Air Compact
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
The World Assembly,
Recognising that the repeal of General Assembly Resolution 342: "Civilian Aircraft Accord" has caused a lack of internationally recognised security measures for civilian aircraft.
Noting the arguments made in General Assembly Resolution 678: "Repeal Civilian Aircraft Accord" to have intended for an improved resolution to take the place of the resolution which it had repealed.
For the purposes of this resolution, defining:
"Military" to mean any state or non-state entity which incorporates the use of weaponry and/or organised violence against another state or non-state entity of the same criteria to exercise control over a set territory.
"Civilian" to mean any non-military entity.
"Pilot" to mean any individual who exercises manual control over an aircraft (defined as a vehicle capable of flight), whether it be from within the craft, or remotely from the ground.
"Civilian pilot" to therefore mean any pilot acting on behalf of any commercial, personal, or otherwise non-military interest whilst acting in their capacity as pilot.
"Civilian aircraft" to mean any unarmed vehicle which is, 1) capable of carrying at least one occupant, 2) piloted by one or more civilian pilots, and 3) capable of sustained flight.
By proxy, defining an "aircraft" as any vehicle which is capable of carrying at least one occupant, piloted by an individual, and capable of sustained fight.
Acknowledging that civilian aircraft are essential for the role they play in facilitating global travel and in the greater international economy as a whole.
Believing that it is the duty of all nations to protect innocent lives regardless of nationality, including during civilian flights over conflict zones.
Resolving thusly to set forth sensible policies which will promote the safety of civilian aircraft in member-nations' airspace, including the maintenance of reliable communication networks by which civilian aircraft may signal if they're in distress.
That all civilian aircraft, regardless of their flight plans, should be adequately tracked whilst airborne for the sake of avoiding collisions and redirecting in the event of unfavourable atmospheric conditions.
That all civilian aircraft itineraries should, if at all economically feasible, be planned to go around conflict zones.
All civilian aircraft which are required by their flight paths to fly over conflict zones must maintain constant lines of communication to their nation of origin so long as the aircraft is within the communication range of the aforementioned nation of origin.
That if the conflict zone which the aircraft is to fly through exceeds the communication of the home nation, the aircraft must maintain constant lines of communication with the nearest neutral nation to the conflict zone.
That all member nations should ensure that adequate crew training is conducted to mitigate the risks of flying a civilian aircraft through a conflict zone to the highest possible degree.
That all member nations should provide ample warnings to passengers regarding the potential for their flight to fly through a conflict zone.
That the onus is on the pilot alone as to whether or not the aircraft they're in control of should comply with any instructions of any combatants within the conflict zone.
Considering prior General Assembly legislation regarding the tracking, security, international law, and miscellaneous handling of aircraft, as enacted in prior resolutions, to supersede this resolution.
Realising that, regardless of however many precautions are taken, the inherent risk posed to civilian aircraft flying through conflict zones is enough to warrant necessary precautions being taken on the part of all member nations in the event that a civilian aircraft signals that it is in any sort of distress.
Mandating that all member-nations maintain a sufficient vehicular fleet that has a range of up to one hundred kilometres away from their overland borders or coastline to aid distressed aircraft, and if need be, rescue the survivors of any civilian aircraft crash.
Acknowledging that not all member-nations may have the budget required to afford a vehicular fleet for the purposes of both aid and rescue, and thus exempting such nations which are wholly unable to fund these measures.
Co-author: Dushina
Passed: | |
For: | 8,682 | 69.4% |
Against: | 3,834 | 30.6% |
General Assembly Resolution # 753
Repeal: “Concerning Financial Fraud”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #177 “Concerning Financial Fraud” (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The World Assembly (WA),
Acknowledging the noble intent of GA177 to combat financial fraud;
Concerned however, that a key operative clause of GA177 states that WA members shall ensure that "all victims of fraud shall receive compensation for their loss equal to or greater than the value of the loss and that this compensation shall be derived from the fiscal and/or material assets of the perpetrator of the act of financial fraud which resulted in the loss";
Believing that this requirement has highly undesirable consequences in some circumstances, namely that in the absence of WA laws to the contrary:
The wording "ensure equal to or greater than the value of the loss and shall be derived from the fiscal and / or material assets of the perpetrator" increases the likelihood that the said assets may be exhausted by the need to pay compensation;
That such exhaustion may result in victims of other more serious crimes by the same perpetrator, in the absence of other legislation, such as rape, rioting, or treason, to receive no compensation as a result;
Further, that such exhaustion also means other obligations of the perpetrator, such as child or spousal support, may also fail to be fulfilled; and
The said provision may also perversely incentivize an individual who is accused (but not yet convicted) of the said offence to waste their assets on hedonistic lifestyle choices while on bail, if such individuals are convicted that they would be found guilty of the said offence and do not have adequate assets to pay out as compensation;
Further noting, since the passage of this resolution:
Protection for savers and investors have been enhanced through GARs 625 and 723;
Tort law reforms have been in place through GARs 447 and 515;
Believing that, in many cases, a reasonable judicial process in a WA state can determine compensation for victims and the sources of such funds properly (such as from the assets of the perpetrator(s), as well as any co-conspirators), and without additional guidance from the WA, and that the WA should carefully consider if a replacement is necessary;
Hereby repeals the target resolution, 'Concerning Financial Fraud'.
Passed: |
For: | 8,095 | 71.8% |
Against: | 3,177 | 28.2% |
General Assembly Resolution # 754
Repeal: “Procedural Rights Of Defendants”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #706 “Procedural Rights Of Defendants” (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Recognizing the need that a criminal justice system seeks the impartial truth and exercises cautious judgement,
Upholding the sanctity of suspects' and defendants' rights,
Recognizing that the needs of the public versus the liberties of the accused must be carefully measured to acquire that truth by which member states reach justice,
Disappointed that GAR #706, "Procedural Rights of Defendants", extends well past the balance of these values by guaranteeing defendants the ability to pick and choose which questions they give testimony for,
Concerned that the pursuit of the truth is not only stymied but frustrated as GAR #706 enables defendants to block up their own trials, answering or not answering questions according to whatever whim prevails them, including such fundamental questions as:
the identity of the defendant,
whether the defendant has chosen counsel and the identity of the defendant's counsel,
whether the defendant understands the charges brought against them, and
how the defendant pleads to a criminal charge,
Recognizing the preexisting right of defendants not to self-incriminate as guaranteed by GAR #37, "Fairness in Criminal Trials",
Further concerned by the allowance of "reasonable interrogation tactics" to produce defendant testimony, which leaves open the likelihood that prosecutors, frustrated at defendants' ability to stonewall the prosecution's line of questioning while answering their own counsel's questions at length, will seek to apply whatever interrogation technique available to them short of torture in order to get answers on the court record,
Distraught that, in the same vein, the target may by its limitations encourage prosecutors to increasingly rely on practices and tools of dubious merit such as body language experts as a substitute for forthcoming defendant testimony,
Convinced of this body's ability to better render the necessary protections for suspects experiencing police interrogation without the aforementioned obstructions to court procedure,
The World Assembly hereby repeals GAR #706, "Procedural Rights of Defendants".
Passed: |
For: | 11,011 | 91.5% |
Against: | 1,019 | 8.5% |
General Assembly Resolution # 755
Repeal: “Bail Conditions Arrangements”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #688 “Bail Conditions Arrangements” (Category: Regulation; Area of Effect: Legal Reform) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The World Assembly,
Appreciating the noble intent of resolution number 688, Bail Conditions Arrangements, to expand due process and freedom for people prior to conviction,
Worried, however, by the self-contradictory nature of the resolution,
Citing the preamble which declares an intent to target the practice of cash bail as unfair towards the less wealthy, however in practice clause 3 requires that cash bail be the primary option for bail,
Acknowledging the writing of this clause was a mistake, and was intended to set cash bail to be used only if alternatives were impractical,
Believing this mistake to be detrimental to the resolution and rendering it nonsensical in its entirety, given that other clauses attempt to limit the use of cash bail, thus effectively eliminating the ability of many defendants to be granted bail, and
Wishing to handle the topic of bail more eloquently moving forward and with respect to the sovereignty of its member nations,
Hereby repeals resolution #688, Bail Conditions Arrangements.
Passed: |
For: | 10,887 | 95.3% |
Against: | 534 | 4.7% |