by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

3

DispatchFactbookHistory

by Yurizuisenzoku. . 45 reads.

Ancestral Alstroemerian History

Ancestral Alstroemerian history


Yurizuisenzokujin culture

Yurizuisenzokujin flag

History
Ancestral Yurizuisenzoku
Modern Yurizuisenzoku


Yurizuisenzoku in general
Overview of Yurizuisenzoku
Yurizuisenzoku Teikoku Guntai


Alstroemerian culture describes that the two eras of Yurizuisenzoku are separated into two: preferably the modern Alstroemerian era and the ancestral Alstroemerian era. This factbook only covers the ancestral Alstroemerian era and history.

In 1956, Alstroemerian historian Komaru Takahashi, proposed the well-known Ancestral Alstroemerian timeline, which is used today by educators. Takahashi, along with cooperation of archaeologists and fellow historians, explored much of the Empire's territories to piece out the said timeline. In 1966, Alstroemerian archaeologist Kazuhiro Shimada contributed to Takahashi's timeline after the unearthing and identification of a daimyō's bones in a site in present-day Satori Prefecture.

A summary of Takahashi's timeline illustrates that the Empire was founded in 1396, at the time Akarui colonists landed in Hokusei's shorelines. Takahashi then also provided evidence of Yurizuisenzoku's proclaimed independence on 8 August 1560 against the Millefiore Empire. The timeline ends in 1764, at the foundation date of the Yurizuisenzoku Teikoku Kaigun.

Contents


1. Overview
1.1. Proponents
1.2. First impressions
1.3. Creation of a timeline
2. Timelines of Ancestral Alstroemeria
2.1 Takahashi's timeline
2.1.1 Shimada's contributions
2.1.2 Credibility
2.2 Kanade's timeline
2.2.1 Contributions
2.2.2 Credibility
3. Impact
3.1 Public opinion
3.2 Recognition of Takahashi's findings
3.3 Recognition of Kanade's findings
3.4 Kanade-Takahashi mixed timeline

Overview

Alstroemerian culture is well-known for organization. The "ancestral era" of Yurizuisenzoku was formed when historians were told to separate the two. The first records of the ancestral era of Yurizuisenzoku being mentioned was in Hokusei Shinbun, in an issue in 1900, when the first historians in the era made breakthroughs.

At the same era, the historians only assumed much of the data of ancestral Yurizuisenzoku through accounts from the members of the Imperial Family and their servants. More contributions in their breakthroughs were the memoirs of former daimyō warriors being unearthed or revealed to general public. Along with that were accounts of the relatives of past warriors and/or the Imperial Family servants.

Proponents

The more known proponent of an "ancestral era" was Emperor Matsuhiro in 1922. He read the first breakthroughs of the historians, and found it too disarranged. The Emperor summoned the historians and told them to segregate such information well.

In 1946, shortly after the Great War ended, a newbie historian, Komaru Takahashi, then created a research paper, a cleaner one, using the data from the 1900 historians. Titled A Research Article about the Ancestral Era of Yurizuisenzoku, it was widely publicized and even made its way to the Imperial residence. Her paper urged other historians to dig deeper.

Two years later, fellow historian Haru Kanade challenged Takahashi's paper. In his essay Inconsistencies and Fatal Errors, Kanade pointed out Takahashi's data is not reliable. He (Kanade) also pointed out that:

Ms. Takahashi should not rely solely on old data. They are only memoirs and words, therefore may be a bit untrustworthy. In order to properly "propose" the 'ancestral era' of Yurizuisenzoku, actual physical evidences have to be unearthed to strengthen her paper's credibility, and to convert her fictional fantasies to a reality.
- excerpt from Inconsistencies and Fatal Errors by Haru Kanade, 1948

Yurizuisenzoku

RawReport