by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .50,33950,34050,34150,34250,34350,34450,345. . .79,52679,527»

Greater novast

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:Oh god we Switzerland, I repeat we have a Switzerland!

yep, Pacific Switzerland here

now with 100% less chocolate and 40% more uranium

Greater novast wrote:yep, Pacific Switzerland here

now with 100% less chocolate and 40% more uranium

Well isn't uranium ore worth more than gold? (Yes that's a song reference)

Greater novast

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:Well isn't uranium ore worth more than gold? (Yes that's a song reference)

i mean it certainly is costly

to my nations environment

Greater novast wrote:i mean it certainly is costly

to my nations environment

obama cube

Greater novast

Of Centralist Brexit wrote:obama cube

oh neutral god he has an obama cube, run for cover

Pakitsk wrote:BoringIt is a deterrent. People who get purged are noted by RMBers, who then know to call us and not to get up to shenanigans themselves.

Justanotherpuppet wrote:The way I see it, we never have any right to excuse people of their actions, but we can be more lenient - say more warnings than usual - for people that are respected, notable, and contributing members of our community. Even then, they should not get off easy. For example, Kampf gets to talk about the clap of his ass cheeks without getting banned whereas a newly founded nation probably couldn’t. That doesn’t mean we will hesitate to ban Kampf if he goes too far, but he has earned a fair bit of leniency by being an active member of our community. We know him, we know he’s chill. We don’t know fledglings that just join our region and immediately break site rules.

True Paki, and fair Aiv.

But I still believe, if there's even a chance for them to turn around, then I will not ban them. At least, not at the first time. It's true that the vast majority of players who get banned here often won't change, but there's always that one person or dude who decides to suck it up and change. Zidium is a recent example and- even if some people dont like him- I believe giving him a second chance was worth it. I think giving EK a second chance was worth it. I think giving Merlo a second chance was worth it. (IK EK and Merlo were different circumstances, but they still apply to the idea of leniency even if not on the RMB itself.) I'm happy I got to know these people, and I never would have if we decided giving second chances and being lenient wasn't in our repository.

When we adapt a strict banning policy, we potentially miss out on people who- if we did give a second chance- become active community members. And yes, merely being active does contribute to the diversity and activity of our community. Without people talking here, there would be no RMB RP community afterall.

Also as a reminder I do ban trolls/spammers when needed- I'm lenient but I don't hold back banning automatically. It's considered per situation.

Pakitsk, Kampf Empire, Restoration of Eastern Kaiserreich, Libright libertarianism, and 1 otherJustanotherpuppet

Libright libertarianism

Euricanis wrote:nerd

No he has a point. The Pak would see a fledgling fool around is very different from how he would see say you or Serkin fool around.

Greater novast wrote:i mean it certainly is costly

to my nations environment

Only profit matters young Switzerland

......don't look at my gorgeous environment

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:Only profit matters young Switzerland

......don't look at my gorgeous environment

Nukes suddenly just start blowing up in your pristine forests.

Justanotherpuppet

Greater novast

Kylondia wrote:Nukes suddenly just start blowing up in your pristine forests.

imagine having rainforests and not bulldozing them to make uranium mines

The death syndicate wrote:In school, I uh, need eexplanationSJWs are very.... odd. Odd, and more odd. I don't understand half of their deranged ramblings.

I don’t really pay much attention to them. Unless they start messing with video games, then I get upset.

Libright libertarianism

Kylondia wrote:Nukes suddenly just start blowing up in your pristine forests.

More like forest....one big gorgeous forest

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:More like forest....one big gorgeous forest

Same occurrence of nukes.

The red dragons pact

Zukchiva wrote:I think giving EK a second chance was worth it.

I beg to differ.

Libright libertarianism

Kylondia wrote:I don’t really pay much attention to them. Unless they start messing with video games, then I get upset.

Well they somehow made Madden worse.

Greater novast

Kylondia wrote:Nukes suddenly just start blowing up in your pristine forests.

also Ill have you know these accusations that I am building atomic weapons really wound me

the underground silos are just for underground food storage, my people have uhh large appetites.

Kylondia wrote:Same occurrence of nukes.

holy anti air ballistics

The red dragons pact

Karatol-Advenra wrote:Remote Desktop Protocol?

This sounds like the name of a really bad Superhero team

Karatol-Advenra and Libright libertarianism

Greater novast

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:holy anti air ballistics

the holy hand grenades big brother

Greater novast wrote:also Ill have you know these accusations that I am building atomic weapons really wound me

the underground silos are just for underground food storage, my people have uhh large appetites.

Imagine having static Nuke silos
this post is made by SBLM gang

Greater novast wrote:the holy hand grenades big brother

I'm afraid....those will be a little ineffective,

The red dragons pact

The red dragons pact

Order of the Saint Dumas wrote:I'm afraid....those will be a little ineffective,

Not if you believe

21k RMB posts since I last logged in. Damn.

Bearstackof2017 and Nordic eurasia

Libright libertarianism

The red dragons pact wrote:This sounds like the name of a really bad Superhero team

We fix computers. Here is our super hero theme.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ3n9wTPKxo

«12. . .50,33950,34050,34150,34250,34350,34450,345. . .79,52679,527»

Advertisement