«123456. . .1213»
Post self-deleted by MAGNUS CAESAR.
Post self-deleted by East Wabbinge.
Post self-deleted by MAGNUS CAESAR.
Thank you. Should we endorse Indorne?
Yes that is ideal. He is a good and loyal soldier who has been a delegate for over 100 days until this raid. He has shown his loyalty and honor.
Only in the extreme situations like the raid do I take full power, otherwise a balance is needed.
What the heck happened?
Post self-deleted by East Wabbinge.
The raid we feared would come happened. Luckily we were able to respond quickly, ban the perpetrators and restore the embassies that they canceled.
Ill write a region wide telegram so everyone knows the details and can be informed.
Wow, I guess I missed the party. ;)
Is everything okay? Is the region out of danger?
Yes, we were saved by our quick response time.
MAGNUS CAESAR and Indorne
The WA Delegate only had the power for embassies, so they tried to cancel all of our embassies. They failed and I restored the embassies, then ejected/banned them. It was a failsafe to limit the power of the Delegate, and now I have taken embassy powers from the position as well. Anyone who is delegate will also have additional officer powers given through their officer position once they proved loyalty, so they will still have the powers necessary to conduct the position.
This way if we are raided, the delegate will only have arbitrary powers to harm the region, while loyalists will have all of the real power.
-Imperator Archon-
Which translates to "I have cheated to gain an in-game advantage." Considering you had been warned for having multiple WA nations previously, all your nations involved in this have been banned from the WA for a year. Do not cheat again, or the consequences may be more severe.
Which translates to "I support a toxic game community were beliefs that other people don't like may be purged." The raider that was delegate probably used the same tactic as me, but he was masking his credentials.
MAGNUS CAESAR, Rusticus i damianus, and Sanctified Hellas
Nations of Byzantine Christendom,
On behalf of the Sovereign and the Royal Federal Republic of Free States, we sympathize with the hardships your region had to endure due to ruthless, immature invaders.
Dominus Vobiscum,
Viceroy Beastland
MAGNUS CAESAR I thank you for elevating me to officer, I will do my utmost best to keep our region safe!
I believe that our map needs an update.
There are many discrepancies as well as newer nations that have joined Byzantine Christendom. Some nations already on the map are extrenously large, while some are so small you can't read their names.
I also recognize how awful the in-built map system is in nationstates. So, I believe that the map is quite a dilemma.
You're right. These two maps are just my previous works and should be used as an example and base for a proper map.
I placed the poll earlier to get an idea of how invested people are in seeing it updated, and with the platform being less than friendly I hoped to get some feedback.
With that in mind Ill try to fix its issues, but it may take some time to get it in order.
-Imperator Archon-
I made an outline for a map without any political borders.
If you guys could let me know what you think of this as a base map maybe, we could generate some ideas.
Aren't there some map generators we can use to ease the process of creating maps?
Post self-deleted by East Wabbinge.
«123456. . .1213»
Advertisement
