by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .454455456457458459460. . .1,0731,074»

Neo-cuba wrote:While the Fifth Empire is more Salazarist-themed, The Iron Confederacy is Francoist-themed. Interesting, don't you think?

I wouldnt rly say we are Salazarist themed at all

Atsuria, The cumbrian state, and Estado novo de marcelo caetano

Estado novo de marcelo caetano wrote:Transgendering = Cultural Marxism

That wholesome transgendering ideas are not so well proved and described I feel them more like a mental desease just like those Egocentric Esoterics who think they are Above Humans, like them they are mentally weak, most of them suffer from traumas which make them go away from the body/soul/psyque therefore they create this new Persona, sometimes they tend to create girl like figures so they mind can explore sexuality, therefore forgetting there is a psychosis linked between a sex depraved ideology.
Most of transgenders trend to say it's natural because other animals can exchange sex.
- But for us humans no, we cannot change, only with science therefore is a abomination.
And for the Psyque isn't that great u just refused to accept being urself and create other self on ur self, so in the psychological functioning you have 2 personas inside 1 persona, while that persona was discarded, basicly you don't have a personality but random feelings attached to the therefore psychosis or trauma.
If a trangendering/sexual identification is a right, maybe everyone should understand and treat me has the gender/sexual identification I wish to be.

Infuture cases I want you to appoint me as Deadly Killing Machine Apache Helicopter.

P.S - to prove my point; it's nothing about Trangendering but Sexual Identification

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPMDCJrRpT8 *

Good talking brother, thumbs up.

However, I would not necessarily see Transgendering as the process of transitioning into "a new sex" in itself as cultural marxism (yet) in the detail of things, but rather as the delusional self-betrayal of your roots and origins. This itself is something that can be understood, the people who would go on about "not being in the right body" are in great pain inside their heads, that pain is inevitably going to cloud one's senses. These people need our compassion and support, but it must be reasonable love, tough love. If you care for your children for instance, would you let them eat sugar sweets whenever they want because otherwise, they'd feel bad? Start crying? Playing on your emotions? Or would you as a responsible parent, with moderation, grant them moments where they can enjoy the sensation it brings to them? Maybe as a carrot for good deeds and proper behavior? Knowing what is right to do and pursuing that before anything else is love and care at its purest, in that, one has to be hard and firm on occasion, because we do not always know what is best for ourselves. Ask anyone with regrets over their life-choices.

As research has shown, gender "corrections" do not release the person from the anguish and anxiety they feel, and suicide-rates among those who have made surgeries, do not improve sufficiently enough to justify the action. Addressing the mental issues underlying is the key to recovery, perhaps even some social ones related to the stereotypization of gender in the wider society et cetera.

If in birth you are born with male genitalia or female genitalia, that is absolute and indisputable evidence of whether you have double XX's or XY's. If you don't have that Y, or that extra X, you're not of the opposite gender/sex. There is nothing more to it, simple, but solid and true. Similar to other simple facts like, "Gravity pulls objects towards each other", or "Without oxygen, humans can't survive" etc. I do not see what the issue is here? Analytical & empirical facts of life just...well...just are. Getting triggered over something completely natural is absurdly ridiculous.

This factuality of one's gender/sex does not necessarily mean a man or a woman should act and be a very strict certain way, but just because one may feel a bit female-ish man or a man-ish female (Possibly due to hormonal-quantity variations in some cases) depending on what the temporal cultural context and background for being "male" and "female" roughly means, doesn't yet make one by composition and fact of the opposite gender. If you view men as "unemotional beings, rough inside and out, then according to your IMAGE of what it is to be a man, then I would not be a man myself. However, these are simply ideas and feelings related to gender, mental observations. Inside the beauty of my atomic and genetic structure, I am a man as can be. Tall and slender; unafraid of, and naturally familiar with emotion, but man regardless, with every biological necessity to reproduce as humans do in the dynamic between man and woman.

Cultural Marxism is the social official (or unofficial) apologetic policy of willful ignorance, the idea that A) We should be sorry for not "recognizing Transgenders/gender-fluidity/non-binary genders", and B) Artificially modifying, supposedly "correcting" your false biological vessel is acceptable and even desirable. Overall, Cultural Marxism manifests in many ways that undermine a healthy and sensible society, "transgender pride" being but one among one forms it takes. Cultural Marxism in Transgender-matters, simply is the force which maintains transgender-delusion.

Your gender is your own unique path of destiny, it is the cards fate dealt you. You could not be anything else. Take pride in that, not anger and grief. Mand and Female, one or the other. Which will it be?

There's great excitement in that for waiting parents and others alike :-)

P0rtvgal, Neo-cuba, and Estado novo de marcelo caetano

Estado novo de marcelo caetano wrote:I believe in Socialism, with Nacionalism included ofc.

I believe in the underlying spiritual principles of Socialism (Taking care of each other, supporting the poor and downtrodden, worker-rights, a stronger state etc.) but I do not believe in the feasibility of Socialism as a system of governance, it has its issues.

Ultimately of course, I believe in Fascism, those values mentioned best surface in it, stabilized by also some of the respectable values of Capitalism (like self-motivation, hard work, diligence).

As I wrote in the TIC ;-)

page=rmb/postid=35812884

P0rtvgal, Brazika, The cumbrian state, and Neo-cuba

Scandinavia-britania puppet

Brazika wrote:Is the earth flat or round? Tell your stories.

Round because if you look at a great lake you will see that the other side of the lake looks like it is sinking

Atsuria, Brazika, and Neo-cuba

Scandinavia-britania puppet wrote:Round because if you look at a great lake you will see that the other side of the lake looks like it is sinking

Welcome to the Fifth Empire brother. Eco-Fascists are most welcome.

Here to stay perhaps? We would be delighted for sure to have you stick around ;)

P0rtvgal, Scandinavia-britania puppet, and Neo-cuba

Scandinavia-britania puppet

Atsuria wrote:Welcome to the Fifth Empire brother. Eco-Fascists are most welcome.

Here to stay perhaps? We would be delighted for sure to have you stick around ;)

Thanks. I used to be a big player in the TIC but now I kind of just want to chill somewhere nice. Btw if anyone wants to do any easy raid soon I have some ideas

P0rtvgal, Atsuria, and Neo-cuba

Scandinavia-britania puppet wrote:Thanks. I used to be a big player in the TIC but now I kind of just want to chill somewhere nice. Btw if anyone wants to do any easy raid soon I have some ideas

Well you can of course always have it bigger here too if you want, granted you've got the motivation and disposition to do so. But if you've been in the TIC, I'd imagine some of our friends there can vouch for you.

As for chilling out, you've got to check out the discord server. We have a good amount of variety in our channels for different kinds of discussion and chatting, and it's a good way to get to know the people around you and make new friends if you're interested in that kind of socializing.

And of course, if you're not feeling the mood for a more serious-minded conversation about some very meaningful topic, you can lose yourself in our memes-and-sillyness channel. Honestly though, it's not always that active but what do you expect? We Fascists tend to be a grim and sad bunch :P

As for raids, we already have some stuff under work. Secret stuff, hush hush.

Brazika wrote:Is the earth flat or round? Tell your stories.

My theory is this: Flat-Earthers are aliens in disguise attempting to seed confusion amidst mankind to make it easier for an invasion by their Annunnaki overlords who want all the gold in Earth.

Scandinavia-britania puppet wrote:Round because if you look at a great lake you will see that the other side of the lake looks like it is sinking

Happens with ships too, or large buildings (cities and such) viewed from distance, which appear "below the horizon" smaller than their real size, as if their lower portions were underwater.

https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirrorCache/c3ccbd5c0a0fb68716a65bf1484ba8ee.jpg

https://www.metabunk.org/data/MetaMirrorCache/6f9feb69ed84c9ba402c1dd44109a2f4.gif

Free assyria wrote:Bro for real I can't even talk about Flat Earthers on NS in any way that won't result in me getting banned.

Take that as you will.

Well if it weren't for NS Moderators and Admin, you'd have free hands to rant and rave about it as much as you want.

Oh girl I just remembered there was that one random flat-earther who built his own rocket and tried to fly to space to "prove" that the Earth is flat, well it didn't go according to plan and/but the guy is still adamant on building a better rocket and trying again.

It's gonna be a big plot twist for our hero.

P0rtvgal, Free assyria, Brazika, and Neo-cuba

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

ecofash pee in the sink
its based and redpilled

Atsuria, Brazika, Neo-cuba, and Estado novo de marcelo caetano

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
- Ted Kaczynski

Atsuria, Scandinavia-britania puppet, Brazika, Anarcho-fascists, and 1 otherNeo-cuba

Scandinavia-britania puppet

P0rtvgal wrote:The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
- Ted Kaczynski

To be honest I think the agricultural revolution was worse

P0rtvgal and Estado novo de marcelo caetano

P0rtvgal wrote:The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
- Ted Kaczynski

About the level of ignorance I expect from an Anarchist tbh.

Free assyria wrote:About the level of ignorance I expect from an Anarchist tbh.

dont talk sh*t about uncle Teddy, the man was a king and a trve man of action revolting against modernity, if lacking in traditionalist notions almost wholefully

Scandinavia-britania puppet and Anarcho-fascists

Scandinavia-britania puppet wrote:Thanks. I used to be a big player in the TIC but now I kind of just want to chill somewhere nice. Btw if anyone wants to do any easy raid soon I have some ideas

Welcome old friend!

Atsuria and Scandinavia-britania puppet

P0rtvgal wrote:dont talk sh*t about uncle Teddy, the man was a king and a trve man of action revolting against modernity, if lacking in traditionalist notions almost wholefully

He was a terrorist who attacked and killed innocent people. The fact he was never executed is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of the 1990s. I don't care about his idiotic Luddite ideology; he's a psycho who is deep off his rocker and should have met a firing squad. If you want to "revolt against modernity" then go live in the woods with the rest of the animals, don't fvcking mail bombs to people.

Free assyria wrote:stuff

Wow. You're pretty trigged.

Scandinavia-britania puppet

Estado novo de marcelo caetano

I advice you all to stop this discussion, this just brings us far instead of together.
We have the same values and the same policies enough battling eachother.

P0rtvgal and Atsuria

Post self-deleted by P0rtvgal.

Make Men Dangerous Again

Atsuria, Badb catha, and Estado novo de marcelo caetano

Anarcho-fascists wrote:Wow. You're pretty trigged.

This post was pointless and immature. If you have nothing of value to contribute to a discussion, then please refrain from participating.

P0rtvgal wrote:No use in "living in the woods with the rest of the animals" when eventually the woods will be torn down and the animals rendered extinct. He targeted people connected to the behavioral and computational industries and one of his 3 successful kills was a timber industry lobbyist. You don't change the world by just living in the woods, you hit it where it hurts. His manifesto would have never been published and his ideas spread to the public had he not demanded it to the press after having gained enough clout as a domestic terrorist, and, despite lacking a fundamentally Traditionalist spiritual and ideological foundation, his written work is not one of a madman but rather of a brilliant mind. The man was also considered a genius by a lot of his peers in academics and published several works on mathmatics. It's also worth mentioning that he was subject to CIA experimentation (in Harvard if I'm not mistaken) and it had a bit of a traumatic effect on him. His ideas are interesting, well put together, and quite appealing to an increasing number of people who blame, among other things, the misuse of industrialization and the subsequent creation of modern capitalism as the reason for the phenomena of mass extinction and loss of habitates and biodiversity, Mankind's common heritage (anthropocene is this era of human-made rapid change acted upon Earth's environments).. The atomization of the individual and continuous shift from an era of quality to an era of quantity, a well as the perceived dangers of digitization of mankind and over reliance on technology, and the decontexualization of Man in relation to nature (and the life in simulacra), are all things that are tied together and thus drive a lot of Traditionalists and right-wing people to fall in love with Ted and his work.

And that's the theoretical part, the ACTION part is particularly attractive to those of revolutionary heart as well. The fact that he took matters into his own hands to cause damage to the system he hates to protect what he loves, and the fact that he evaded the police for years and lived mostly off grid, is highly romanticized, and rightly so.
It's quite pathetic to think you're going to solve the issues of over consumption and pollution and all of this crap ingrained into this beast of a system, that you're going to get the right people moving in the right direction, by any other means other than violence, especially when you're ahead of your time and do not have public acceptance. Many of his environmentalist concerns are now more commonly accepted, because he was aware and right about the absolute state of things well head of everyone else. He knew point of no return was close, so he acted on it. Innocent people? hardly anyone's innocent. We're all willful participants in a system we're too cowardly to rip apart before it's too late. His mission wasnt one of mass following, it was of radicalization and of destabilization and it wasnt a total failure.

Uncle Teddy is an inspiration, even if he wasn't completely right. An unaffiliated domestic terrorist strikes true terror into core of the machine.

Free assyria wrote:He was a terrorist who attacked and killed innocent people. The fact he was never executed is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of the 1990s. I don't care about his idiotic Luddite ideology; he's a psycho who is deep off his rocker and should have met a firing squad. If you want to "revolt against modernity" then go live in the woods with the rest of the animals, don't fvcking mail bombs to people.

I believe the point Free assyria was attempting to convey was that Ted Kaczynski was ultimately a force for chaos and that should not be ignored. However, P0rtvgal likewise has a point that the infamous "Unabomber" does indeed make many valid points.

Kaczynski is first and foremost an example of everything we as Fascists should oppose for he is lawless anarchist spreading fear and discord through violence in defiance of the civilized order intrinsic to human society. In this he is a Reactionary rebelling against what cannot be rebelled against: progress, advancement, and innovation. He is one of many examples of people attempting to halt the inevitable change of life, the universe, and yes even nature itself that comes with development. His rejection of - and indeed any rejection of - Industrialization is absurd, ignorant, and counter-productive. Fascism itself was born out of the fires built by an Industrial World, as mere just about every philosophical and ideological ideal and argument from the 19th century to the present day and who knows how far into the future. The Industrial Revolution was the true birth of the Modern World as we know it, and this is not necessarily a bad thing. The Modern World was unavoidable; it was always coming and there was nothing on Earth that could stop it - even a million Unabombers could not have prevented this necessary change and nor could/can they reverse it. This is because all things are constantly evolving as unstoppable forces and as such those who seek to stand against them and become the immovable object will find that they are not, cannot, and will not be able to achieve such an ambition. They will crushed, stampeded, run over, and buried in the dirt and dust of history. I have read Kaczynski's works and I can say for certain that he is indeed a highly intelligent man with many valid points, but he is wrong in many regards all the same. Humanity will not and cannot return to a hunter-gatherer's society for it is not a sustainable method of civilization; it was abandoned for this very purpose. His espousing of revolution is not what would come to pass in the event of instability and anarchy he seeks to promote would somehow reach the required power to dictate the changes necessary to bring about the primitive world he believes Mankind should return to, it will only create unceasing madness that will end in the total destruction of human civilization and quite possibly human extinction entirely. His solutions, though well-thought out and precise on their pinpointing of the problems in Modern Society, are incompatible with human nature and the inherent desire for order we as a species aspire toward. His understanding of human nature and society is inherently flawed even if he precisely understands our relation to science, industry, and technology. But the fact of the matter is that these three things are important to a Fascist society and a Fascist society cannot exist without them because a Fascist Society is merely another form of Modern Society, one with a better understanding of the human collective than all alternatives.

That being said, Kaczynski is not a fool and while I am not a psychiatrist or psychologist I do not believe he is mentally unstable (it should be noted that neither intelligence nor wisdom necessarily prohibit one from being mentally unstable; quite the opposite, in fact, as many serial killers have been recorded as being quite intelligent, educated, clever, shrewd, or informed with very few exceptions - the miscommunication that mental instability leads to ignorance and unintelligence is one born from a society that misunderstands the human psyche entirely, with mental illness being one specific). His summary of the Left-wing is indeed remarkably accurate and undeniably well-informed for certain, as is his claim that those espousing ecologically-friendly views must stand in opposition of both Leftism and Conservatism. His arguments that the Industrial Revolution and all things spawned from it have been bad for humanity in general are not entirely false either. While he is wrong in the regard that they have been totally bad with absolutely no benefit, he is right that it has led to many a greater concerns and issues we now face today - ones that are indeed worldly problems and must be tackled globally. This is not the inherent fault of Industrialization, however, and more the fault of Enlightenment thinking and Capitalist economics. Ironically his own cry for 'human freedom' is in and of itself a spawn of the Enlightenment's re-imagining of the concept of 'Liberty'. I can also applaud his radicalism for the sole reason that it is quite clearly genuine; unlike the leaders of Jihadist organizations, who are cowards who seek only to further their own power and control over others. It is rare to see such a shining example of an ideologue in this day and age and so I can proudly say I applaud his honesty. It is undeniable that the Unabomber has had an effect on the understand of modernization, industrialization, urbanization, and environmentalism and that those looking to keep themselves informed of such topics should indeed take a look at Kaczynski's work as I personally believe they are essential to the topics. He makes many valid points and many critical errors alike; both are important to understand.

Kaczynski is a controversial figure for certain and I for one cannot say that I approve or disapprove of his methods, ideals, or the man himself. He was not entirely wrong; but, likewise, he was not entirely right either. He is an outlaw and terrorist, a great enemy of order and the state for which we as Fascists all stand for, yet he is also a visionary and sign that necessary changes must be made to the world - that the current status quo must be broken. He has identified the problems and their affects, but misidentified their cause through the bias of his own personal ideology. He deserves neither praise nor scorn but is instead a figure to be studied and understood. This much is true: something must be done and soon, or the Earth and all those who tread upon it will perish. Technology and Industry are neither a boon nor a bane but are tools that can be harnessed for both good and evil; as such they must be applied with moderation. To rely too little is to condemn ourselves to unnecessary misery and suffering, but to apply too much is to render ourselves weak and helpless. We must remember that Temperance is a virtue without succumbing to an idealized and romanticized fundamental misunderstanding of the earliest human societies as Kaczynski did. The past is the past; and the past was not always better. But we must also remember that over-consumption - overindulgence - is leading the so-called "Free World" into decadence, stagnation, and ultimately self-destruction with every passing decade. We see from this a society that accepts or even idolizes sin and excess as something good and welcome.

Whether you believe he is an inspiration or a misguided soul, Ted Kaczynski is a figure that cannot and should not be ignored. I believe the message he sent is worth looking at if nothing else, and for that reason it is best to keep an open mind in his regard so that we may better understand it. Personal feelings and morality have their time and place, but so do reason and logic.

P0rtvgal, Atsuria, Chalybea, Free assyria, and 1 otherEstado novo de marcelo caetano

Badb catha

P0rtvgal wrote:Make Men Dangerous Again

Man was always dangerous and will always be dangerous. It has simply become commonplace to reject our violent, aggressive, predatory nature. Humanity in it's rawest, most natural form is simply taboo in the illusionary Liberal Utopia. From this comes weakness and servility; the gateway to control over all the world by those whose power is measured by the weight of their pockets rather than by the force of their punch.

There is a time and place for violence.

P0rtvgal, Atsuria, Chalybea, Free assyria, and 1 otherEstado novo de marcelo caetano

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

Post self-deleted by Atsuria.

«12. . .454455456457458459460. . .1,0731,074»

Advertisement