«12. . .143144145146147148149. . .198199»
Which football though
Edit: Nvm, it's Amerifat. I only like Amerifat football because I like the Texans
Your team is gonna need to say a prayer then because they be going against the Saints. God have mercy on their souls.
I never said I thought they were good
I mean, they did make it to the playoffs so I think you'll be able to do that again this year.
I like both forms of football but to be fair, I’ll never refer to American football as football
Demoness and Joushiki nante iranai
American Football? Psh, it's basically rugby but easier.
English Football? Much better, but I don't tend watch it. Only exception is the World Cup.
Being mostly ignorant on both, I thought rugby also had different rules than American football.
But I would rather watch football than either.
Agreed. And yeah, the rules are different, but to anyone who didn't know the difference they look remarkably similar.
Hello lads how r your lot doing
Hello all! We are the GLUA, a cross region para-military. And no befor you ask u don't have to leave your wonderful home region you just have to join up for our discord!
I do occasionally watch football but the only thing I watch regularly is the super bowl. I of course do not watch the meme sport known as soccer.
Dam i Guess theres activity on Discord than RMB or is there any good reason
Forgot to post, thought I did but new poll! This week's topic is about age limits on candidates for office.
Sup i am a Stego-home for the Stegos of Moha
It made sense when the average lifespan was 65 as the justices may only serve 10-15 years, but now? No, not when we live to be 85-100+ (depending on your personal health) or when justices might have long hospital stays. How are they doing their job then?
But in regards to the poll, one 75-year-old might be more capable than another, just like any age group. There are people my age I wouldn't like to see in charge of one person, let alone given any real power, so it would be undemocratic to discriminate like that. However, we really need term limits on government positions because no one needs to serve tenure in the realm of decades. They cannot possibly still know what their respective constituents need if they never live in their respective districts.
that is true, age limits are arbitrary. however, you do have statutory rape based on age limits, you also have age limits for taking the office of president and senator and voting and working and drinking and tobacco use... it seems that so long as you are going to have arbitrary age limits anywhere and consider them moral, an age limit for s.c.o.t.u.s doesn't seem all that different or especially immoral.
True. Statutory rape is supposed to be based on the mental, emotional, and physical differences between a developing adult (preteen/teenager) and full adult, but lately I've come to realize that state laws are in fact a bit more arbitrary about them and are actually a bit disturbing on that front. However, that digresses from the topic, as do the other age limits for non-political topics (though they are interesting to discuss).
I had forgotten about the age limit for President. I believe it had something to do with maturity, but I honestly question it as a requirement now that I really think about it. I concede the point that it doesn't seem that different to set an age max, though putting that into law would probably require context (like we just did).
No poll until Sunday all. Forgot to mention that yesterday.
I think I might join that when you get the link posted.
«12. . .143144145146147148149. . .198199»
Advertisement