by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Post

Region: Forest

Uan aa Boa wrote:I appreciate that nazi and commie are often used loosely and inaccurately. I'm guessing, however, that when you were last called a communist you weren't newly arrived from The Internationale, flying a hammer and sickle flag, calling yourself the People's Republic of Kim Jong Gulag, and introducing yourself by saying "Workers of the word unite." If I'm right there, it wasn't really an equivalent situation.

Well based on an overarching perspective the situation is obviously not the same, from the perspective of the accused however it may very well be.

Cuillin wrote:
Hi Novian,

I felt horrified on seeing this nation's symbolism and language, but I didn't say anything because I'm newish here and didn't want to rock the boat. Only later based on their manner did I feel I needed to speak out, and I have apologised for my tone in response to what I saw was someone promoting Nazi symbolism and language. I think what they had on their profile was a deliberate provocation, and they were looking for the reactions. To me, their whole manner was disingenuous and very coy despite the very obvious symbolism they represented.

I see what you are saying, and I understand why you are making the argument. In good conscience I disagree. For me, the symbolism combined with how he engaged with the maybe I am/ maybe I'm not style I think was deliberately done. I read through some of the things he has on his nation, and from his writing I think he is not as daft as he presented us with.

To me, there is no equivalence between communist and Nazi. I think communism is a political view/ideology that is understandable if misguided. I think Nazism is a death cult rather than an ideological position and should not be tolerated anywhere. I don't think there is equivalence in calling someone a fascist and a Nazi either. I think calling names is wrong regardless, but there is a difference of severity there.

For me, I think had he reacted differently to and realised what his symbolism meant, then I probably would have reacted differently too! That is not to excuse my response at all. Such as it was, he did not present to me as a misguided and ignorant person. Rather he presented as someone who thought it would be a bit of fun to provoke others. His style is coyly provocative, and he started with that same routine with the new region he joined.

I don't necessarily take issue with your reaction, as really at most I think it may have just been a bit premature.

ContextReport