«12. . .955956957958959960961. . .1,9161,917»
Dude I clicked the link and got a virus, wtf! It’s fake, Chief
This new World Assembly vote? Even if it's voted in, I'll bet it gets a ton of repeals. Abortion is such a controversial issue, and legally requiring every single nation to fund it is a no-win situation.
Orangemain, Illiricium, and Perro fecia
by the way, my opinion on the matter? It's murder. I just don't see, as a woman, how a woman has the right to vanquish or allow life to keep living, even if it hasn't fully developed yet.
Illiricium, Grand northern empire, and Saxoslavia
Woah. I didn't expect to see that on the internet. I'm so used to being insulted and attacked just for saying that. I am glad that you exist.
Illiricium and Saxoslavia
Thank you so much! It's important that we stand for our beliefs despite what others say, and I'm unafraid to get a little messy if it means that I do so.
Illiricium, Grand northern empire, and Saxoslavia
Dear WA Leaders,
I am writing to inform you that the Chair has reviewed the proposed bill submitted in the World Assembly titled "Access to Abortion", authored by Imperium Anglorum.
Overall I can say that it bears a lot of economical notions and it is quite wordy but in essence, it lacks "empathy". It is this Speaker's opinion that bills which directly affect the health of your citizens, should be regulated on a national level instead off an international one.
Additionally, the bill violates the rights that fathers bear to decide about the future of their offspring.
All and all, this bill is a direct violation of national sovereignty and human rights, therefor the Speaker's Office votes: NO
The united australian states, King denver, Illiricium, Perro fecia, and 1 otherTiewwa uwu
HaHa. I already voted NO.
Although I live in Serbia, a poopy Dictatorship we still have abortion illegal. But some activists are fighting to legalize it.
God-King Rorschach, King denver, and Perro fecia
Its all RP though. The actual on-site statistics don't matter to me because it is not forcing me to actually do anything as an individual. Some people may have some ethical concerns and I think that irl the person who created this WA proposal is someone I would not care to meet. But NS is just a platform and isn't really forcing you to actually believe/abide by the WA rules in real life. Its all I.C. stuff.
King denver, Illiricium, and Perro fecia
Post self-deleted by Tiewwa uwu.
heyheyheyhey how do you join gensec
Hey, there, sweet lovely members of humanitas:
You may see that "Access to Abortion" is up at-vote right now. In short, it requires every nation to fund on-demand abortion procedures across the World Assembly. It also forces nations to define personhood as beginning at birth and pay for contraceptive access, among other things. Obviously, anti-abortion nations will find this outrageous. But I also think that it makes complete sense for pro-choice nations to oppose this as well, for a few reasons:
This resolution punishes poorer nations, who often have the highest abortion rates, by requiring them to directly pay for abortion procedures in their nations. While this arrangement may be beneficial for rich nations, like the United States, it becomes much harder to do when countries don't have the money to make this happen to begin with. And remember -- the consequences for non-compliance are steep: fines and then embargoes. So poorer nations are stuck with two choices -- slide into economic dependence on the World Assembly (which breeds imperialism) or risk facing hefty fines and sanctions.
It is a one-size-fits-few solution to a complicated problem. A lot of nations are understandably wary of solutions that make them financially-dependent on the WA and its regulations -- it diminishes their ability to make sovereign decisions. Where possible, we should seek solutions that empower nations to create sustainable infrastructure to make this happen in the long-term. The resolution's author made a good point when I tried to draft a resolution calling for free college for everyone in the World Assembly. He said that while perhaps that may be a good aim, it's infeasible for poorer nations to make that happen. Instead, he said, we should focus on improving access to primary education everywhere. I agree -- not every nation can meet the mandates of this resolution, so we should focus our time on more fruitful efforts.
Anti-abortion nations just won't comply. And those are the people who we most need to comply -- the ones who aren't protecting abortion rights already. Some will say that these nations will face "fines" and "sanctions," but the WA doesn't possess a genuine sovereignty at all. If pro-life nations don't want to comply, they can just agree not to sanction each other either. Maybe a more moderate resolution could convince them to sign on.
This resolution is undemocratic. It was drafted with the intent of spiting several anti-abortion authors and in order to demonstrate the pro-abortion rights block's "authority" over the World Assembly. In order to get this resolution to vote, it appears that the North Pacific Army (the largest gameplay military out there) propped this up to vote with loads of artificial approvals. Hardly "democratic," even as the author openly campaigns on "the popular will."
Thanks,
UM
-United Massachusetts
Upper ontario and hudson bay, The united australian states, God-King Rorschach, Illiricium, and 1 otherPerro fecia
Too bad the link says what it literally is
I’d have a lot more respect for you if your name was not UwU just why
Tierra was taken
hello
The Traditional States, Altemoosburg ii, and Tiewwa uwu
h i
South Bengal, The Traditional States, and Tiewwa uwu
cool!
Why was your name stolen, Chief?
I revived this account for no reason since I couldn't stalk 
Green Africa(Believe me I want to), so I just let it lie in enadia with my main account.
«12. . .955956957958959960961. . .1,9161,917»
Advertisement
