«12. . .2,5322,5332,5342,535
You got the Soviet-esq style down to the heartbeat! Nice flags!
I saw the Pride flag get Britished though lol
2nd time in heavy debt and payday is close by but I just lost my bank's over protection and a decent paycheck ;-;
Ivorica and Free Toast
How's it going friends I'm just been enjoying a vr game of ghost of tabor not bad
Ivorica and Free Toast
I think its safe to say that "Flags of Toast" will have to be delayed lol
Of course the one time I put a deadline on one of my things NS crashed and burns to prevent it.
Yep and ns is still trying to fully recover lol
Ivorica and Free Toast
We have survived the great crash!
I root for the 'bad side alot lol
Ivorica and Free Toast
Oh, you thought "Flags of Toast" was the next Toastypedia thing to release?
Well...
Political Parties V2
▇
Update 1.0 = Basic Facts for all current parties + pictues for government parties [DONE]
Update 2.0 = Pictures for all current parties [DONE]
Update 3.0 = (creation of- and) interlinking to other pages
Update 4.0 = fully adding defunct parties
▇
Political Parties of the UCSR
▇
This article lists political parties in the Soviet Union.
Names for parties are listed in Anglo, Toaseteian and Esperanto. Toastypedia does not guarantee the accuracy of translations.
By the Law for outlining the procedure of Elections, any organisation with "a clear goal to advance society for the better through political means" may request to be recognised as a political party by a "relevant" electoral commission.
Historically, the Lejine-Bloc has been the dominant force in the Soviet political scene, with most opposition parties being confined to single republics or even districts. Many "politically compatible" parties or political organisations often get assimilated into the Lejine-Bloc when growing long enough. The Communist Party is the dominant force in the Lejine-Bloc, with only two times other parties in the Lejine-Bloc had a premier elected from their ranks.
The following Parties have a presence in every Republic or in the Supreme Soviet
Logo | Name | Abbreviation | Leader | Ideologies | Founded |
Sowaje-Werjene Komjuniseje Parite |
SoWeKoPA |
Amjiro Hereni (formal) |
Offical: Factions: |
1. May 1801 (as USPT) |
|
Soziare-Demokoratije Sowjetaje Parite |
SoDePa |
Njana Asjotiseki |
Offical: Factions: |
20. October 1804 (split from CMT) |
|
Tjikawa-Wjazhisete Woronote |
TjiWja |
Zhjimona Zowjotu |
Offical: Factions: |
26. May 1932 (merger of many groups) |
|
Sowjetaje Liberije Parite |
Sov'Liberika |
Setomene Zhjazhewu |
Offical: Factions: |
15. June 1801 (as TLP) |
|
Anarikaje Toaseteoje Wederati |
AToWe |
Towu Eweriki |
Offical: Factions: |
9. February 1920 | |
Gol'Idiwejate Parite |
Gol'IPa |
Iakowe Mireku |
Offical: |
24. June 1801 (as monarchist TAU) |
|
Parite eso Zhjouwa eso Poritikie |
Zhjouwa |
Pitjero Kozoriko |
Offical: |
13. October 1804 (split from TAU) |
|
Sowjetaje Natjinoareje Demokoratije Parite | SoNaDePa |
Goderehado Podoseke | Offical: Factions: | 10. June 1801 (as TNP) |
The following Parties have a presence in any Soviet that's at least District-Level
Admin Note: This Section lacks logos of the political parties. We are working on adding them.
Logo | Name | Abbreviation | Leader | Ideologies | Founded | Note |
Sozhiariseteje Pawjoba (Zhetalenjoreje) |
Zhetalenjoreka |
Zhetareljino Kjopo |
Offical: Factions: |
10th October 1972 |
Monitored |
|
Sozhiariseteje Pawjoba (Gasoteniteje) |
Gasoteniteka |
Eridani Sjunitu |
Offical: Factions: |
10th October 1972 |
- |
|
Najinoare-Sozhiariseteje Woronote "Sew-Njon'Ze-Sewje" |
NaSoWo |
Boro Bjidowe |
Offical: Factions: |
28. November 1964 |
Monitored |
|
Demokoratije Tjikawa-Sowjeta Parite |
Wurjije Demokorataka |
Asitero Dazhjere |
Offical: Factions: |
26. June 1965 |
- |
|
Sowjetaje Kizheje Parite |
Kizheje |
Iena Jezhtowu |
Offical: |
13. January 1980 |
- |
|
Kekjepe Nju Liberite |
KeNjuLi |
Jaoni Henotera |
Offical: Factions: |
20. May 1989 (Original) |
Banned in 1991 |
Admin Note: This Section is not available yet. We are working on adding it.
I finally got around and made logos for the remaining parties.
On the "Main page", there is now also a changelog with the last 5 changes and a detailed changelog linked under "Recent Changes".
Idk if Flags of Toast is now actually the next thing to be done because the way I formatted the factbook needs me to write a lot of text, and I suck at writing long text, so who knows what will be next.
Maybe Parties again because I noticed that the toastian text in some of the older logos is pretty low quality and probably needs to be redone, but Parties 3.0 probably won't come out for a few years because really don't know what historical parties I could put in except for others that are already mentioned.
A WIP Ivorican Tank Master List Factbook!
Planned to be finished in 3 days, simple test
If the names of foreign tanks are different (ex: Soviet T-72 actually called Super Toast Tank #55), names will be updated ASAP
Tanks of the United Federal States
A photo of M4A4E8 "Easy Eight" variation of the
most produced and operated tank in history, the M4 Sherman
which embodied improvements made throughout its production
and usage due to its versatility.
From the Free Encyclopedia
The United Federal States of Ivorica has produced tanks since their inception in the First Great War, up until the present day. While there were several Ivorican experiments in tank design, the first Ivorican tanks to see service was the indigenous designed Hudson 3-Ton Tank or the T1 Tank and the PanIvorica T2 Light Tank. Followed closely by Utopian designed light tank FT (called T3 Tank in Ivorica) and a joint tank design with Snowylan, T4 Libertania.
In the Interwar Period there was significant tank technology advancement in Ivorica due to the Roaring Decade of the 1910s with large investments, and continued emergency funding for workers during the Sorrowful Decade in the 1920s. Ivorican tank design further acceleration during the Second Ivorican Civil War where several tank prototypes and theories were presented. The popular "Tank Brothers" would all split off during the Civil War, where two defected from Ivorica while one would stay in Ivorica, eventually creating the M4 Sherman in 1934, a year before the war ended.
In World War II, Ivorica came to the fore with tanks designed for mass production and reliability reflecting the Ivorican position as the "Arsenal of Democracy". The M4 Sherman would become the most produced tank in history with over 120,000 being produced and being one of the most iconic. Ivorica would also introduce the second Main Battle Tank in history, the M19 Ultra Pershing.
During the Cold War, Ivorican tank designs would clash against Soviet tank designs, creating the Old World design versus the New World design. Soviet or New World designs would often have better tank guns and electronics with a lower silhouette while Old World designs would have a more efficient engines, range, survivability, and comfortability. Generally, both designs had relatively similar armor protections until the creation of the M1 Abrams in Ivorica, which had superior armor than any Soviet tanks.
In the Modern Era, Old World tanks were often seen to be in better quality and reliability than New World tanks. Until recently, Soviet tank designs struggled to match the M1 Abrams tank armor durability, however, the Next Generation Military Program, saw the creation of the M2 AbramX, which is regarded as the "world's most advanced and dangerous tank" (Premier Amjiro Hereni, Rhedeva Times, 2025, during the "T-14 Armata Disaster!" Interview).
The Ivorica has been greatly influential in the design philosophy, production and doctrine of tanks, and has been responsible for some of the most successful tank designs.
Markings and Naming
Ivorican tanks today are marked by "M" before tank number and title. However, Ivorica has designated tank model generations, the T Series, the 1st Gen M Series, and the 2nd Gen M Series. In official military and government reports, a full Ivorican tank name for example would be 3GT2019M1A3CSEPv2TUSK Abrams, the most recently researched and procured M1 Abrams model. Broken down, 2G refers to Third Generation. T2019 refers to variant introduction year. M1 refers to tank model, A3 refers to tank variation, C overall modification to current variation, SEP (System Enhancement Package), refers to interior focused modifications, and TUSK (Tactical Urban Survival Kit), refers to exterior focused modifications. Export versions of Ivorican tanks may have even longer more complicated names. However, in more nonofficial reports or a non formal design environment, the Abrams would be referred as to Abrams V 3 or M1A3C.
All Ivorican tanks are required to be named after any Ivorican Army, National Guard, Special Operations, or Marines personnel. Leading to famous soldiers and officers being honored through Ivorican tanks.
When continuing a design variant, the name of the tank would add prefixes before its honorific name. The most common are Super or Ultra. Notable examples are Super Lee, Super Sherman, and Ultra Pershing. If a honorific name is to be reused again, a Remun numeral will be added after it. Such as the M3 Brooker II.
List
Comprehensive list of Ivorican tanks divided by their Ivorican Designation Generation.
First Generation
Image | Name | Production | Developers | Features |
T1 Tank | 1907-1908 | Hudson Motor Company | Weight Length / Width / Height Crew / Passengers Main Armament Engine / Top Speed / Range | |
T2 Light Tank | 1907-1908 | PanIvorica Automobiles | Weight Length / Width / Height Crew / Passengers Main Armament Engine / Top Speed / Range | |
T3 IFT | 1908-1919 | PanIvorica Automobiles | Weight Length / Width / Height Crew / Passengers Main Armament Engine / Top Speed / Range |
The Free Encyclopedia is designed and maintained by public volunteers.
Funded and supported by Citizendium Compendium, a Non-Profit Organization based in Sparkhill.
Powered by Donators
This is part of the Pax Ivoricana Universe, a "what if Ivorica won the Cold War?"
Because I can't create complicated factbooks anymore because of the Army taking up majority of my time these days, I have used some parts of Alteran Republics' amazing styles. Check out their rad factbooks.
I have not put much thought into Toastian military equipment except for some basic "Which irl country am I basing it on?"
I should probably also do that...
See for me, it was building the wiki style thing that made me procrastinate. Especially since I didn't have much time as before, but I luckily found a template I liked and frankensteined it into that. Though a "List of Equipment of the United Federal States Armed Forces" is going to be painful as my "List of Russian Armed Forces" due to finding bunch of images, resizing, plopping it in, and making sure the dumb [/tr] is in the right place else it just blows up.
The coding is one of the worst parts of making factbooks. Especially when sometimes doing a thing a certain way breaks everything and sometimes it won't. I still haven't figured out why sometimes an empty line breaks [background-block] apart, and sometimes it won't. It's the bane of my existence. At least now that I have many wiki-style factbooks, I can somewhat standardise certain things (like tables), but because, for some reason, I can't help but make everything increasingly complex, that doesn't really save me that much time.
I can make more complex "Equipment dedicated factbook" with all the coding and stuff, the only problem is making it dynamic as Wikipedia ones. So smart spoilers, floating jump box, left and right float boxes at same time take like 90 mins at least to get it right without text. Oh god the text, tactfully placing spaces around to make it fit right
Note: I went on a rant mid way but it did some lore building so leaving it, go to bottom to see TLDR about tanks
Some of the more meta gaming thing I had to do in Pax-Ivoricana timeline, just because Soviet tanks aren't actually canonized yet, so just basing it off of IRL Soviet tanks;
The design philosophy between the Old World versus the New World. Though the Old World vs New World dynamic is supposed to mimic the West vs East so I might change it to something else. Maybe the North vs South terminology? Idk because the third and supposedly forth continent adds complications to my timeline, as only Lezra is supposedly Ivorica dominant, Afrique Soviet dominant, the others continents a massive battleground for the Cold War, and then Santland. Complications.
ANYWAYS!
Old World vs New World Tank design philosophy
Old World tank design philosophy is comparable to Western design philosophy. So, quality over quantity, reliability over replaceability. With two different subbranch again compared with the West, the heavy tank on tank doctrine (ex: M60, Chieftan, Abrams, Challenger) which result in heavier but more durable tanks. Then the hit and run doctrine (Leopard, AMX-30) where the armor is made to stop infantry weapons and thats it, just a big gun and powerful engine to fire and leave. Over Soviet or New World Tanks, Old World Tanks are more spacious, averagely larger, comfortable, higher survivability rate, fuel efficient, and somewhat reliable.
However, for New World Tank design, which is like the Eastern philosophy irl, tanks from Toast are cheaper to produce, lower silhouette, with a much more powerful and longer range guns, and better electronics. Different from real life where until the T-80 and later T-80U/UK, Soviet tanks had very bad electronics and stabilizers compared with Western tanks.
In terms of ammunition, both were pretty much the same (except that Toasti tanks had 125mm since 1963 that is comparable to the current Russian 2A82-1M 125mm gun on the T-14 meanwhile the most powerful MBT gun was the rifled 105mm. Meaning Toasti tanks had a tank gun twice the effective and total range of Ivorican tank guns). Both philosophies had similar armor ratings, except Toasti ones like the irl Soviets, still had the same armor design flaws. Since T-55s, T-62s, T-64s?, T-72s, and T-90A have that ammunition stowage weakness.
The idea which Old World designs were superior than New World designs started in 1980 after the release of the M1 Abrams. 1970s saw immense stagflation for both Ivorica and Toast and soon a small depression, and from 1978-1993, was involved in a massive proxy in the continent Santland is at (I forgot the name ;-;) where Ivorica was able to successfully break from the stagflation and was able to rapidly grow its economy, while Toast economy would fail to recover and go to a freefall which led to a small civil conflict and near collapse, resulting in almost all Soviet troops returning to UCSR in 1997 from almost everywhere, decommissioning several military and naval bases, and left few Communist Lezran countries besides Austronata, which UCSR was attempting to integrate in itself. With UCSR economy collapsed, leading to trading closures, UCSR brink of civil war with some of its republics attempting to break away, Ivorica would quickly fill in the power vacuum, converting Communist, Socialist, and few remaining Syndicalist countries to Capitalism and dominating the world trade. By August 10th, UCSR had several rogue military elements and republics attempting to break away, and on November 17th, 1997, the last of Toastian troops would leave Austronata, which is considered the last day of the Cold War, Ivorican victory. UCSR would fall into a very small civil war, between its Old Red Guards and the Reformers, with the Reformers winning in 1999, retaking any breakaway Republics in 2001, and putting down most insurgencies in 2003. With last of conflicts ending 2006.
During this time, Ivorican technological advancements were still rapidly continuing, especially Old World Tanks, with the Abrams being super advanced, Leopard 2s, Challenger 2s, and Leclerc being upgraded to next generation. While the most advanced Toastian tanks were the 1989 T-90 and the 1987 T-80UK until 2014 where its modernization upgrades came, even then it was comparable to a T-90a or T-80BVD, versus Old World tanks which its technology level was of irl 2014-2015 levels. Ivorican tanks in 2014 were comparable to a IRL K2 Panther or M1A2 SEPV3. This caused a stigma which New World designs were always inferior in quality and technology, but in reality, a near UCSR collapse and mini civil war resulted in several of its military programs halted, and a huge catchup projects being passed to somewhat keep up against Ivorica's massive military industrial complex.
This was suppose to be about tanks, not history! Apolocheese🧀 for going on a mini rant TLDR below:
Old World (Western) vs New World (Eastern) tank design philosophy. Old World quality and reliability over New World replaceability and powerful tanks. Equal in stats until UCSR near collapse, where Old World tanks continue developing while New World stopped (except whoever gets China's tech), resulting in skewed opinion New World tanks are inferior whille Old World were always the best.
Edit: Again, massive meta gaming for my timeline, though it is called Pax-Ivoricana not Weak Ivoricana. I expect the Toastverse and Santec-Superior have its own meta gaming on Ivorica and any other technology so Im not too worried.
Me as BFL reading this technology post: Hmmmmm I'm probably f here <---a regional/superpower
Me as Shadow company reading this technology post:If I can buy or make it contracts for money <----a power for hire
«12. . .2,5322,5332,5342,535
Advertisement