by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

The North PacificBoard

Search

Search

(?)

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .75,03175,03275,03375,03475,03575,03675,037. . .130,620130,621»

North dancia

He could pick 2.

Friently wrote:Regardless you violated the previous deal we made so im going to set a new one, a final one.

You've been causing trouble and kicking up dust for way too long and frankly? With the behaviour you've shown here? We have every reason to kick you off the map.

But i am Friently, and so against better judgement i'll give you one more chance.

In my previous deal i kinda gave the others the short end of it by letting you get out from under their treaty, in favor of giving you an easier restart. But thats not gonna happen again.

So here are the options;

1. You will adhere to the treaty set in place, and you will adhere it completely. So if it says no rearming it means no rearming, when it says 50,000 at the max that means 50,000 at the max, no more. If it says therell be an occupation force there will be one. There will be no fighting it, no rebellion, no insurgency, no kicking out the soldiers, no reconnaissance, no rearming the state, no ships built, NOTHING. Unless allowed by them. You will follow this until they release you and not before that. Ofcourse the period they keep this on you will have to be reasonable. If you fail to follow this you will not receive another chance and be removed.

Or option no.2: you get removed from the map right now for an accumulation of violations of the rules. And given your history it is unlikely you would be allowed back on by the carto team any time soon.

So those are the choices set before you. What will it be?

P.S.; the treaty in question page=dispatch/id=1522330

Lorigia

Hoissuru

Hello all good nations of the world which we do not intend to infect with a biological weapon which causes all those infected to end up losing all their skin and consequently die, and even if we wanted to, we do not have the technology to create one

The Empire of Pandoska

Amestris and freedonia wrote:yeah I'm going to save it when a zombie apocalypse happens on sr which granted I am way too lazy to write so I'm not going to be causing it

We tried a zombie thing in a small nation a while back I think it was Lorigia but that nearly started a global war because a certain nation Pandoska tried to unleash the sun on its overrun capital.

Lorigia and East supple lund

Amestris and freedonia

Pandoska wrote:We tried a zombie thing in a small nation a while back I think it was Lorigia but that nearly started a global war because a certain nation Pandoska tried to unleash the sun on its overrun capital.

how about you just quarantine your Capital instead of nuking it

North dancia

Amestris and freedonia wrote:how about you just quarantine your Capital instead of nuking it

Because the whole population would go bye bye.

East supple lund

Hoissuru wrote:Hello all good nations of the world which we do not intend to infect with a biological weapon which causes all those infected to end up losing all their skin and consequently die, and even if we wanted to, we do not have the technology to create one?

Ok?
Not sure why’d you tell me this since clearly you don’t have the capability to do so stoopid

:P

Lorigia

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa

Amestris and freedonia wrote:option 1

Are you scrapping the dreadnoughts or not

Italy and malta

What's the drama happening here now?? Someone getting yeeted from SR?

The Empire of Pandoska

Amestris and freedonia wrote:how about you just quarantine their Capital instead of nuking it

We tried what did you think we meant by overrun

Lorigia

East supple lund

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa wrote:Are you scrapping the dreadnoughts or not

He has too, no?

Lorigia and North Baba

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa

East supple lund wrote:He has too, no?

He is building two, which is violating the treaty

Socks the cat

North dancia

Option 1 is just Option 2 but it takes long and gives a worse punishment depending on what he does next.

Socks the cat

Amestris and freedonia

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa wrote:Are you scrapping the dreadnoughts or not

fine whatever I'll scrap them the metal could be used to build a new cruise ship

Hoissuru

Amestris and freedonia wrote:how about you just quarantine your Capital instead of nuking it

Because is it better to destroy the evidence and blame someone else?

East supple lund

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa wrote:He is building two, which is violating the treaty

Well, not anymore, or Frient send down the banhammer

O_o

Lorigia and North Baba

Italy and malta

Can someone PLEASE answer my question here?

Tsereia

Hello.

Socks the cat

The ✠ Grand Empire ✠ of Friently

Weeeest viiiiirginiaaaa wrote:Are you scrapping the dreadnoughts or not

They would be retconned out of existence

Amestris and freedonia wrote:option 1

Ah a smart choice, now be sure to actually follow it.

East supple lund, Pinguioris, and North Baba

North dancia

Amestris and freedonia wrote:fine whatever I'll scrap them the metal could be used to build a new cruise ship

I got to admit, you could have a rich economy if you push for naval economics, it would amazing, you could use the ships from that war so you can make museums too.

New saint domingue

Hello, nations of the North Pacific!

Ethnon and Tsereia

Amestris and freedonia

North dancia wrote:I got to admit, you could have a rich economy if you push for naval economics, it would amazing, you could use the ships from that war so you can make museums too.

I don't even know how long it takes to build a cruise ship

Italy and malta

Socks the cat wrote:Why

Because im so confused on whats happening

Socks the cat

Italy and malta

Amestris and freedonia wrote:I don't even know how long it takes to build a cruise ship

Id give it 2-3 years max

The Federal Republic of Oannia

Friently wrote:Regardless you violated the previous deal we made so im going to set a new one, a final one.

You've been causing trouble and kicking up dust for way too long and frankly? With the behaviour you've shown here? We have every reason to kick you off the map.

But i am Friently, and so against better judgement i'll give you one more chance.

In my previous deal i kinda gave the others the short end of it by letting you get out from under their treaty, in favor of giving you an easier restart. But thats not gonna happen again.

So here are the options;

1. You will adhere to the treaty set in place, and you will adhere it completely. So if it says no rearming it means no rearming, when it says 50,000 at the max that means 50,000 at the max, no more. If it says therell be an occupation force there will be one. There will be no fighting it, no rebellion, no insurgency, no kicking out the soldiers, no reconnaissance, no rearming the state, no ships built, NOTHING. Unless allowed by them. You will follow this until they release you and not before that. Ofcourse the period they keep this on you will have to be reasonable. If you fail to follow this you will not receive another chance and be removed.

Or option no.2: you get removed from the map right now for an accumulation of violations of the rules. And given your history it is unlikely you would be allowed back on by the carto team any time soon.

So those are the choices set before you. What will it be?

P.S.; the treaty in question page=dispatch/id=1522330

wow, but what has he done?

The Empire of Pandoska

Amestris and freedonia wrote:I don't even know how long it takes to build a cruise ship

A year

«12. . .75,03175,03275,03375,03475,03575,03675,037. . .130,620130,621»

Advertisement