COL (Governor):
The United States of Paramountica
WA Delegate (non-executive):
The United States of Paramountica (elected )
Founder:
The Administrative Founders of Libertyworks
Last WA Update:
Embassies: The League, United Kingdom, New West Conifer, Eurth, The Free Nations Region, Violetia, The Coalition of Democratic Nations, The Western Isles, The Confederacy of Free Nations, The Order of the Grey Wardens, St Abbaddon, The Democratic Commonwealth, Capitalist Paradise, The Bar on the corner of every region, United League of Nations, The Universal Order of Nations, and 49 others.Greater Middle East, Historia Novorum, The Democratic Republic, Zentari, New World Union, Lands End, Tarkin, New Coalition of Nations, Israel, Region Name, United Christian Empires of the West, Krasnaya, RAMS, The Sunlands of America, India, Union of Free Nations, Guinea Kiribati, Hollow Point, Fredonia, EPCOT Center 1981, The Region Of Gargery, Coalition of Crown Albatross, matheo, Yecyma, Gypsy Lands, The Great Universe, Lyrali, The Confederacy of Free Lands, Liberal Democratic Union, Aeterna Publicae, The Interdimensional Community, Crown of Victoria, The Embassy, Esvanovia, Council of Constructed Languages, Regionless, North America, Dispatchia, The Three Isles, The Central Pacific, Council of Asia, The Conservative Democracies, Gwelchbodia, Novarus, Blue Ridge, Geopolity, Arborhaven, Commonwealth of Sovereign States, and Moonveil.
Tags: Anarchist, Anime, Anti-Fascist, Capitalist, Casual, Communist, Conservative, Defender, Democratic, Eco-Friendly, Enormous, Fandom, and 33 others.Fantasy Tech, Featured, Free Trade, Future Tech, Game Player, General Assembly, Human-Only, Imperialist, Independent, Industrial, Liberal, Libertarian, Map, Modern Tech, Monarchist, National Sovereigntist, Neutral, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, Outer Space, Past Tech, Post-Modern Tech, Regional Government, Role Player, Security Council, Serious, Social, Socialist, Sports, Steampunk, Surreal, Video Game, and World Assembly.
Regional Power: Very High
Commonwealth of Liberty contains 103 nations, the 288th most in the world.
Today's World Census Report
The Fattest Citizens in Commonwealth of Liberty
World Census takers tracked the sale of Cheetos and Twinkies to ascertain which nations most enjoyed the "kind bud."
As a region, Commonwealth of Liberty is ranked 14,325th in the world for Fattest Citizens.
![]() | Nation | WA Category | Motto | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | The Dominion of Wussein | Capitalist Paradise Corporate Slave State | “The Market Makes” | |
| 2. | The United States of Paramountica | New York Times Democracy Corporate-Dominated Sham Democracy | “E Pluribus Unum” | |
| 3. | Corporate Police State Halliburton | “Dieu et mon droit” | ||
| 4. | Iron Fist Consumerists Imperialist Pig Dog Oppressors | “We Will Endure” | ||
| 5. | Compulsory Consumerist State Consumerist Wage Drones | “Make money” | ||
| 6. | The Federal Republic of -India | Capitalist Paradise Corporate Slave State | “सत्यमेव जयते” | |
| 7. | Capitalizt Self-Congratulatory Merchant Bankers | “Dio, Patria, Famiglia” | ||
| 8. | The Jollibee of Greater Adriatican State | Capitalist Paradise Corporate Slave State | “Maka-Diyos, Maka-tao, Makakalikasan at Makabansa!” | |
| 9. | The ROC of Taiiwan | New York Times Democracy Corporate-Dominated Sham Democracy | “为人民服务!” | |
| 10. | Capitalist Paradise Corporate Slave State | “There is no god but god; Muhammad is the prophet of god” |
1234. . .1011»
Regional Happenings
- :
The Democratic Republic of Greater Kurdistane arrived from Lazarus.
- :
The Abbasiyah Republic of Hudson Straits arrived from Balder.
- :
The Workers Democracy of Socialist Democratic Republic Romania arrived from Osiris.
- :
The Abbasiyah Republic of Hudson Straits ceased to exist.
- :
The Directorate of Earana of the region Prodigy Corporation proposed constructing embassies.
- : Tetapeguai ceased to exist.
- :
The Megacorporation of The North Trinitum Trading Company ceased to exist.
- :
The Vth French Republic of Metropolitan Francais arrived from Osiris.
- : The union of corporate america ceased to exist.
- :
The Penn Central Transportation of Kewtpuff arrived from Osiris.
Commonwealth of Liberty Regional Message Board
Loading...- OCTOBER 2002
Olê, olê, olê, olá, Lula, Lula!
L U L A ¹
|
|
PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN TRAIL — DAY
BRASÍLIA, DISTRITO FEDERAL,
Brazil Toucan
▌As August rolled on, the presidential race was shifting gears, and LUIZ INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA was once again leading the pack among the candidates. His support had seen quite a bit of movement in the months prior, but the latest numbers indicated that the dip he experienced in July had leveled off. LULA was sitting at thirty-seven percent, while CIRO GOMES trailed behind with twenty-seven percent. JOSÉ SERRA and ANTHONY GAROTINHO were lagging even further, with thirteen and twelve percent, respectively. These figures really highlighted how quickly the dynamics of the campaign could change. LULA kicked off this period with a solid forty-three percent in May and stayed above forty percent in June, but then gradually lost ground in July. On the flip side, CIRO had a different trajectory, starting from a smaller base and gaining traction throughout the summer, only to lose some of that momentum later on. SERRA struggled to maintain his voter base, while GAROTINHO also saw a decline before experiencing a slight uptick. ZÉ MARIA was stuck at one percent, and RUI COSTA PIMENTA was below one percent. Additionally, four percent of voters were gearing up to reject all candidates with a blank or null ballot, and six percent were still undecided. The campaign was unfolding against a backdrop of tough economic challenges. The Brazilian currency was facing increasing pressure, and the government finalized its agreement with the International Monetary Fund on August 7. The candidates had different takes on this arrangement. LULA framed it as a necessary step, likening it to an unavoidable trip to the dentist to explain his stance. CIRO, on the other hand, criticized the agreement but recognized that the government had limited options. GAROTINHO dismissed the arrangement as “spurious,” while SERRA argued it was essential. Meanwhile, CIRO was starting to lose some of the political stability he needed to effectively challenge LULA. JOSÉ CARLOS MARTINEZ stepped down from his role as campaign leader after financial issues involving PAULO CÉSAR FARIAS, known as PC, came to light. His running mate, PAULO PEREIRA DA SILVA, was also facing allegations that added to the pressure. Despite these challenges, CIRO managed to secure support from ANTONIO CARLOS MAGALHÃES and former President FERNANDO COLLOR DE MELLO. However, he turned down COLLOR's endorsement, and the rivalry between CIRO and SERRA intensified following their televised debate on August 4.
The numbers painted a clear picture: the presidential race wasn't just about who could rally the most voters. The candidates showed significant differences in how loyal their supporters were. LULA faced a rejection rate of thirty-three percent among the electorate, while GAROTINHO was turned down by thirty-two percent and SERRA by twenty-eight percent. CIRO had the least amount of voters who said they would never back him, sitting at seventeen percent. When asked to name a candidate without any prompts, LULA stood out again, with twenty-five percent of respondents mentioning him spontaneously. CIRO followed with eighteen percent, while SERRA and GAROTINHO together made up just six percent. However, many voters were still keeping their options open, with thirty-five percent admitting their preferences could shift before election day. LULA's base appeared to be more stable, as seventy-one percent of his supporters expressed their intention to stick with him. In contrast, GAROTINHO's followers were more likely to switch, with forty-three percent considering a change. SERRA's supporters were also uncertain, with forty-seven percent open to exploring other candidates. This fluidity in the middle of the field was crucial. CIRO had the chance to attract discontented SERRA voters, while SERRA could still win back some of those leaning towards CIRO. The anticipated second round was shaping up to be more competitive, with LULA and CIRO now tied at forty-five percent, erasing the earlier advantage CIRO had. CIRO was clearly in a stronger position when compared to SERRA, leading with fifty percent to thirty-two percent, and his edge over GAROTINHO was even more pronounced at fifty-six percent to twenty-seven percent. Meanwhile, LULA was making a comeback in parts of the South, particularly resonating with women, younger voters, and those who had completed secondary education. CIRO's base of support remained strongest among higher-income Brazilians, and his campaign was also appealing to university graduates and middle- to upper-income voters. On the other hand, SERRA was increasingly relying on the affluent and well-educated segments of society. In contrast, GAROTINHO was starting to regain traction outside the major urban areas, especially in smaller towns and among certain middle-class groups. As a result, the election was shaping up to be a contest between two rising campaigns, with LULA and CIRO gaining momentum while SERRA and GAROTINHO worked hard to avoid being sidelined.
The way voters were behaving indicated that the campaign was still very much up in the air. A significant portion of the population was still getting to grips with the voting process. In fact, a whopping seventy-four percent didn’t even know the numerical code they needed to enter on the electronic voting machine to cast their vote for president. Only fourteen percent had the right number down. LULA had a bit of an edge here, with twenty-five percent of his supporters able to recall his code. CIRO's supporters came in at ten percent, while GAROTINHO had seven percent and SERRA trailed with six percent. What stood out even more was the distinction between voters who truly favored their candidate and those who simply saw them as the least bad option. Thirty-six percent admitted they chose their candidate because they couldn’t find anyone better, while fifty-eight percent felt that their preferred candidate was genuinely the right person for the presidency. LULA really stood out when it came to personal connection, with a solid sixty-one percent of his supporters seeing him as their ideal candidate. On the other hand, forty-one percent of CIRO's backers viewed their choice mainly as picking the best option available. SERRA had a similar situation, with forty percent of his voters feeling the same way. Those who chose to leave their ballots blank or null had their own reasons too. Almost half of them, about forty-nine percent, believed that none of the candidates were truly ready for the Presidency. Additionally, twenty-five percent saw their vote as a clear sign of their dissatisfaction. So, the election was being influenced by two different dynamics: a growing rivalry among the leading candidates and a significant number of voters who were still unsure. LULA had taken the lead, CIRO emerged as the most viable alternative, SERRA needed to stop his downward trend, and GAROTINHO was trying to build on a small recovery to achieve something bigger.
LULA CAMPAIGN HEADQUARTERS — NIGHT
SÃO PAULO, SÃO PAULO,
Brazil Toucan
THE WORKERS' PARTY TAKES THE PRESIDENCY.
The PT's rise to the Presidency marked the end of a political battle that had defined Brazilian politics for over twenty years. Established in 1980, the party dedicated years to building its foundation through organized labor, social movements, and a series of presidential campaigns. Their big break finally came with LUIZ INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA, who at fifty-seven, triumphed over JOSÉ SERRA, aged sixty, and led the PT into the national spotlight. This victory was more than just one candidate beating another; it showcased how much LULA had evolved from the political persona he had in his earlier campaigns. The man who was once known for his confrontational style was now positioning himself as a unifier, capable of bridging gaps across political and economic divides. His campaign reached out beyond the PT's usual base, actively engaging with groups that had previously viewed him with skepticism. After winning the Presidency on his birthday, LULA emphasized the importance of uniting different segments of society to tackle Brazil's challenges. Choosing JOSÉ ALENCAR GOMES DA SILVA, who was seventy-one, as his running mate further solidified this broader coalition. A businessman and senator from Minas Gerais, ALENCAR brought stronger connections to the private sector and conservative political circles to the ticket. LULA's victory marked a significant moment in Brazilian history, earning him several notable distinctions. He became the first President elected from a left-wing party, the first worker to hold the office, the first civilian President without a university degree, and the first person from Pernambuco to take on the role of head of state. The campaign itself was nothing short of extraordinary. Over the course of three months, LULA traveled to ninety-three cities, attended one hundred and three rallies, took part in sixty-three carreatas, spent a whopping one hundred and forty-seven hours in the air, and covered an impressive sixty-one thousand one hundred and twenty-seven kilometers. The PT also poured more resources into this campaign than ever before in a presidential election, with spending projected to exceed thirty-five million reais. DUDA MENDONÇA led the main communication strategy, while a dedicated team including JOSÉ DIRCEU, ANTÔNIO PALOCCI, ALOIZIO MERCADANTE, RICARDO KOTSCHO, ANDRÉ SINGER, and PAULO CALDAS worked tirelessly to coordinate the political and organizational aspects of the campaign.
LULA's fresh political strategy didn't just pop up out of nowhere during the last campaign; it was the result of years of development. After his defeat by FERNANDO COLLOR DE MELLO in 1989, LULA and the PT underwent a significant transformation. The party gradually opened up to collaborating with groups beyond its traditional supporters, and LULA started to position himself as a unifier rather than just a challenger to his rivals. This approach went beyond mere campaign rhetoric. Influential figures from diverse political and economic backgrounds began to take notice of his shift. Former Presidents JOSÉ SARNEY and ITAMAR FRANCO, ex-governor ORESTES QUÉRCIA, businessmen like EUGÊNIO STAUB and JOSMAR AVELINO, and DELFIM NETTO, who had served in the military government, all acknowledged or backed parts of this new direction. DUDA MENDONÇA played a key role in amplifying this change through television, crafting emotional ads and brief campaign segments aimed at audiences that hadn't always been natural supporters of the PT, especially women and older voters. LULA also made a point to engage with institutions where the PT had historically had little sway. He reached out to Febraban, Bovespa, Fiesp, Fierj, and the Superior War College, bringing his campaign face-to-face with the banking sector, financial markets, industry, business groups, and military establishments. These appearances played a crucial role in reshaping his image from a politician primarily known for his opposition stance to one who could engage with nearly every significant interest in the country. However, the electoral win meant that this fresh political identity would soon face its toughest challenge. Securing the Presidency didn’t automatically grant the PT enough backing in Congress to roll out its agenda. The new government would need to forge parliamentary alliances beyond its usual partners and find common ground on issues that had previously divided the PT from other political factions. Adding to the complexity was the economic uncertainty, which required the new administration to address the worries of financial markets and the business sector while still trying to honor its political promises. The very transformation that helped LULA clinch the election would now become part of the governing challenge. The PT had transitioned from opposition to holding executive power, and LULA had shifted from being the nation’s leading challenger to the one in charge of its governance. The campaign had showcased his knack for building a broader coalition; now, the Presidency would reveal whether that coalition could withstand the pressures of actual governance.
▬▬▬
¹ A Series: LULA, President of Brazil for two terms and co-founder and member of the Workers’ Party.
DER DEUTSCHERBUND GERMAN BUREAUCRACY DAS BUNDESKANZLERAMT
______
THE FEDERAL CHANCELLERY: HEIL DIR IM SIEGERKRANZ — KOHL'S FIFTH VICTORY!
FEDERAL GERMAN CONFEDERATION | BERLIN, SEPTEMBER 2002
| EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT, THE FEDERAL CHANCELLERY - | By September 2002, Germany had entered an era that few observers in the early 1990s thought possible. Instead of retiring from politics in 1998, Helmut Kohl successfully retained the Chancellorship, navigating the political turbulence following reunification and the introduction of the euro. His government weathered the early-1990s recession, managed the enormous financial burden of German reunification, and entered the new millennium with Germany firmly established as Europe’s economic and political leader. Kohl, now 72 years old, campaigns on a simple message: “Stabilität, Verantwortung und Zukunft.” Stability, Responsibility and the Future. His argument is that Germany should not abandon the policies that transformed it into Europe’s largest economy simply because the political winds have changed. The 2002 election campaign became increasingly competitive throughout the summer. The SPD, led by Gerhard Schröder, attacked Kohl claiming he belonged to another generation and argues that Germany needs new leadership for the 21st century. |
Kohl responds by emphasizing his record:
German reunification European integration Creation of the euro Germany’s central role in NATO Strong Franco-German relations Expansion of German exports Berlin’s establishment as the national capital Germany’s growing influence within the European Union
| The CDU/CSU campaign increasingly portrays Kohl as the “Chancellor of German Unity and European Stability.” A particularly effective campaign advertisement shows images of the Berlin Wall coming down in 1989, the signing of German reunification documents, the Reichstag, and the introduction of euro banknotes. The closing narration declares: “Deutschland ist wieder vereint. Europa ist vereint. Jetzt bauen wir die Zukunft.” (Germany is reunited. Europe is united. Now we are building the future). At 18:00, German television networks released the first projections. The result immediately shocks the political establishment which had been banking on a tight SDP victory. |
| The CDU/CSU emerges as the largest political force in the Bundestag. With the FDP crossing the parliamentary threshold, Kohl is able to form another CDU/CSU–FDP coalition. At CDU headquarters in Berlin, supporters erupt into celebration. Shortly after 20:00, Helmut Kohl walks onto the stage. The crowd chants: “Helmut! Helmut! Helmut!” Kohl raises his hands, waits for the crowd to quiet, and delivers what becomes one of the defining speeches of German history. |
Kohl’s Victory Speech:
(English) “Today, the German people have decided. They have opted for stability. They have opted for responsibility. And they have decided that our shared journey in Europe should continue. We reunited Germany. We have united Europe. And now we must shape the future together. Germany will continue to grow in the 21st century. To be a land of peace, freedom, and prosperity in the new century. For Germany. For Europe. For our shared future.”| Chancellor Helmut Kohl | “Heute haben die Deutschen entschieden. Sie haben entschieden für Stabilität. Sie haben entschieden für Verantwortung. Und sie haben entschieden, dass unser gemeinsamer Weg in Europa weitergehen soll. Wir haben Deutschland wiedervereinigt. Wir haben Europa zusammengeführt. Und nun müssen wir gemeinsam die Zukunft gestalten. Deutschland wird auch im 21. Jahrhundert ein Land des Friedens, der Freiheit und des Wohlstands sein. Für Deutschland. Für Europa. Für unsere gemeinsame Zukunft.”
| The room erupts again. |
A New Kohl Government:
| The following morning, German newspapers ran enormous headlines. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: “Kohl gewinnt — Deutschland setzt auf Kontinuität” Die Welt: “Die Union bleibt stärkste Kraft” Süddeutsche Zeitung: “Kohl vor seiner letzten Amtszeit?” The question immediately became unavoidable: How long will Kohl remain Chancellor? At 72, even supporters acknowledge that his political career is approaching its final chapter. Rather than attempting to establish an indefinite Kohl era, the new government begins discussing an orderly transition within the CDU. Possible future successors include younger figures such as Angela Merkel, Edmund Stoiber, and other rising CDU/CSU politicians. But for the moment, Kohl remains firmly in command. Kohl announces that his final government will concentrate on five major objectives. Kohl considers European integration his greatest unfinished project. |
Kohl's European Integration Agenda:
Stronger EU institutions Deeper economic coordination Continued euro-zone integration Enlargement toward Central and Eastern Europe Stronger Franco-German cooperation A more unified European foreign policy
| Kohl repeatedly emphasizes that Germany’s prosperity is inseparable from the European project. The euro has just entered everyday circulation, and Kohl makes its success a major political priority. The government launches a public campaign emphasizing that the euro represents the culmination of decades of European cooperation. Kohl famously tells the Bundestag: “Die D-Mark war erfolgreich. Der Euro wird Europas Zukunft sein.” |
| The government launches a major competitiveness program aimed at keeping Germany’s manufacturing sector at the forefront of the global economy. |
Investment is directed toward:
Automobiles Machine tools Chemicals Aerospace Nuclear energy Telecommunications Advanced manufacturing Research and development
| The government particularly emphasizes German exports to the United States, Japan and rapidly developing Asian economies. Kohl intends to keep modernizing Germany as it forges strongly into the 21st century. Kohl announces an ambitious infrastructure program. Berlin receives continued investment as the new federal capital, while Frankfurt, Munich, Hamburg, Stuttgart and Cologne remain major economic centers. |
The government expands:
High-speed rail Motorways Telecommunications infrastructure Airports Nuclear power-plants Renewable-energy research University and scientific funding
| Despite the Soviet Union waning, Kohl continues to see Moscow as a direct threat to European and global security. It is however the indirect threats that Kohl's new government will begin paying attention to. Following the September 11 attacks, Kohl argues that Germany must assume greater international responsibility. Germany remains firmly committed to NATO and works closely with the United States. |
The Bundeswehr receives additional funding for:
Peacekeeping Expeditionary operations Transport aircraft Naval ships Intelligence Special forces Modern communications Research and development
| Kohl describes Germany as a “responsible power, not a military power.” Overall the election fundamentally changes the mood of Germany with a new political atmosphere. Instead of entering what pollsters and political analyst predicted would be a Schröder-led era, Germany enters the 21st century with Kohl’s political generation still at the helm. Yet there is an increasing realization within the CDU that the Chancellor cannot remain forever. Behind closed doors, CDU politicians begin discussing the eventual “post-Kohl era.” One name increasingly appears in those conversations: Angela Merkel. A younger generation of CDU politicians begins positioning itself for the future while remaining publicly loyal to the Chancellor. Kohl himself understands what is happening. During a private CDU meeting, he reportedly tells colleagues: “Eine Partei darf niemals von einer einzigen Person abhängig sein.” (A party must never be dependent on a single person). For now, however, Germany remains Kohl’s Germany. And as the newly reelected Chancellor stands before the Bundestag in October 2002, the political message is unmistakable: The Kohl era did not end in 1998. It entered a final, unexpected chapter in 2002. |
- ______
GOTT MIT UNS! EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT! UNITY AND JUSTICE AND FREEDOM!
N I H O N K O K U • J A P A NFOUR YEARS IN • JAPAN UNDER KOIZUMI JUN'ICHIRŌ • THE STATE OF THE NATION, SEPTEMBER 2002 在任四年、小泉純一郎政権下の日本、国家の現状 2002年9月
|
- 国家の現状
SEPTEMBER 2002
| The Government
Koizumi Jun'ichirō marked four years as prime minister in July 2002, the longest unbroken stretch of LDP leadership since before the bubble collapsed, and he has spent most of it converting the diplomatic room the 1999 Senkaku and Takeshima settlements opened up into a defense posture the party would not have tolerated from anyone it trusted less. The cabinet reshuffle that followed the July 2001 Upper House win kept Tanigaki Sadakazu at Finance and Abe Shinzō at the Chief Cabinet Secretary's desk, a decision read inside the party less as caution than as confirmation of who Koizumi intends to hand the office to eventually. The security minded factions that consolidated behind the 1999 defense budget have set the party's direction since, and the fiscal conservatives who forced that budget down from 4 to 3.2 percent have not recovered the ground they lost in the process.
Koizumi has floated postal privatization publicly twice since the 2001 election and retreated both times once the rural postmasters' network, still one of the LDP's more reliable vote delivery systems outside the cities, made its objections known through the party's internal channels rather than on the Kokkai floor. The Emperor continues to receive the formal briefings the constitution requires on matters like these, and continues, as in 1999, to have no mechanism by which his reservations become anything other than a private matter between himself and whichever prime minister happens to be standing in front of him.
| The Economy
The stabilization plan Tanigaki built in 1998 closed its formal implementation phase in the first half of 2002, with the Financial Services Agency scaling back the emergency reserve requirements and consolidated loan funds that had governed bank supervision since the crisis. Of the roughly 340 firms identified for resolution rather than continued lending between 1999 and 2001, the large majority have been liquidated or absorbed by domestic buyers, and the state enterprises given expanded acquisition mandates in the original plan have mostly returned to their ordinary function. Commercial land prices in the six major cities, which had fallen every year since 1991, posted their first flat reading in early 2002, a number the cabinet has cited more often than its size probably warrants.
The one percent interest rate floor and the managed yen band have both held since 1998, though exporter groups have begun quietly pressing the Ministry of Finance on whether the band still serves them now that the currencies of some regional competitors have moved further than Tokyo anticipated. Housing density reform has fed a construction boom that overlaps considerably with the naval program's own demand for steel and skilled labor, which has made it difficult for economists outside government to say how much of the recovery belongs to which policy.
| The Rearmament
Three years into the ten year window, JS Satsuma was floated out of her building dock in June for fitting out, a milestone the Defense Agency marked publicly given how thoroughly the ship has come to stand in for the program as a whole in domestic coverage. JS Tosa remains under construction behind her, and JS Hizen's keel was laid in August, completing the class's start of construction ahead of the original schedule. The ninth Hayabusa-class patrol boat entered service the same month, one of a steady stream of smaller commissionings that has done more to normalize the expansion in daily naval life than any single battleship milestone could.
The terminology question has not gone away. The Democratic Party of Japan and the Social Democratic Party have both asked for a formal Kokkai debate on what "heavy strategic battery support platform" is actually meant to accomplish under Article 9, and the government has declined both requests on the grounds that the program's legal basis was settled in 1999 and does not require revisiting every time a hull enters the water.
| The Region
The Senkaku and Takeshima settlements have held since 1999 without reopening as active disputes, though nationalist commentary in the Kingdom of Joseon has treated the Takeshima transfer as an open wound rather than a closed one, and Tokyo has generally found it easier to let those commentaries run than to respond to them. Washington's preference for a more capable Japanese defense posture, the same preference that helped Koizumi's government past the 3.2 percent figure in 1999, has hardened somewhat as the alignment between the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China has continued, and burden sharing conversations between Tokyo and Washington now assume the Satsuma-class's eventual entry into service rather than treating it as speculative.
The World Cup Japan co-hosted with the Kingdom of Joseon and the People's Republic of China that May and June gave all three governments a diplomatic register other than the one their militaries usually speak in, and the organizing committee's cooperation was, by most accounts, genuine rather than performed. Whether that cooperation survives contact with the strategic distrust sitting underneath it is a question none of the three governments have had to answer yet.
| The Opposition
The DPJ's position on the rearmament has been complicated by the same thing complicating everyone else's, which is that the program has been popular in the prefectures doing the shipbuilding and unpopular mostly in the abstract. The Japan Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party have taken the harder line consistently, and neither has the seats to turn that line into anything beyond a formal objection. Keidanren, for its part, has not been shy about the contracts.
| Japan in September 2002
Four years into the Koizumi government, the crisis that brought him to office is administratively closed and the program that followed it is a third of the way through its own timeline. The land price numbers are flat rather than falling, the postal question is deferred rather than settled, and the Satsuma-class is afloat rather than commissioned, which is a specific kind of progress that photographs well without actually finishing anything. Koizumi addressed the Diet at the start of the autumn session and described the recovery and the rearmament as the same project viewed from two angles, a formulation the opposition finds convenient and the cabinet finds accurate. Neither claim will be fully tested until the ships the country has been building since 1999 are the ships it actually has, rather than the ships it is still, three years in, in the process of becoming.
■ □ ■ □ ■ □ ■ □ ■ □
国家の現状 - A SERIES on Japan under the Koizumi government, the crisis that brought him to office, the rearmament that followed it, and the question of whether a country can run both projects at once without either one paying for the other. . .
- OCTOBER 2002
Education First
1 0 D O W N I N G S T R E E T ¹
|
|
HRH TREASURY EXCHEQUER — MORNING
WHITEHALL, LONDON,
Great Britain GB
The Labour Government is putting education front and center in its domestic agenda, with TONY BLAIR pledging significant new funding to revamp Britain’s secondary school system. Schools across England and Wales are set to receive an extra £50,000 each, and the education budget is expected to soar to around £12.5 billion over the next three years. This boost means that funding for schools and universities will rise by about 6% each year until 2006, giving these institutions a much-needed financial lift. For the average school, which usually gets about £100,000 in grants, this extra funding translates to roughly a 50% increase over the specified timeframe. The Government's goal is to raise educational standards while fundamentally reshaping how secondary education is organized and managed. ESTELLE MORRIS, the Education Secretary, plans to roll out initiatives to support struggling comprehensive schools, provide more help to those that are doing well, and introduce new strategies to enhance discipline and attendance. More classroom assistants will be brought on board to lighten the load for teachers, and select schools will be grouped into federations under the leadership of a single senior head. The most challenging of these roles could offer salaries nearing £100,000, highlighting the Government’s commitment to empowering experienced school leaders with greater responsibility and authority.
Education is becoming more and more recognized as a vital part of the Government's broader agenda, with enhancements in schools seen as key to the nation's long-term economic and social growth. ALAN MILBURN, the Health Secretary, has highlighted education as a top national priority, putting it on the same level as revitalizing public services. He believes that the quality of education will have far-reaching effects that go well beyond the classroom. The larger spending initiative will channel extra resources into international debt relief and programs aimed at alleviating poverty in developing nations, while the Government's overall spending is expected to rise significantly over the next three years. By the fiscal year 2005–06, public spending is projected to hit around £511 billion. Departments will work under formal Public Service Agreements that outline specific goals and performance indicators, with regular evaluations designed to ensure that the increased funding leads to real improvements. New oversight mechanisms will also be put in place to track how public funds are used and enhance control over departmental budgets. As a result, this program merges a significant boost in Government spending with a stronger focus on accountability, performance, and the efficient management of public services.
The program is really focused on childcare and supporting working families. It’s rolling out a new network of children’s centers designed to blend childcare with health advice and a variety of family support services. Many of these centers will team up with schools to offer before- and after-school care for kids whose parents work outside the usual school hours. This initiative is all about creating more job opportunities for women and cutting down on reliance on low-wage part-time jobs. In communities facing economic challenges, these centers will play a key role in helping single parents find jobs or pursue training, with access to childcare linked to their participation in job-related programs. The ongoing shortage of childcare slots is a major hurdle for working families, especially during school holidays when current services can’t handle the demand. By integrating education, childcare, employment support, and family services into a comprehensive public investment strategy, the Labour Government is aiming to build a stronger social support system while highlighting educational improvements as a vital part of its long-term domestic policy.
▬▬▬
¹ A Series: 10 DOWNING STREET, concerning the government affairs of the PRIME MINISTER's office, workings with the House of Commons, and the whole of the Whitehall system — a road that is recognized as the centre of Her Majesty's Government in Britain; the road is lined with government buildings housing and its Whitehall mandarins.
- MARCH 1985
The Rose Returns to Brasília
T H E S A R A H Y E A R S ¹
|
|
PLANALTO PALACE — MORNING
BRASÍLIA, FEDERAL DISTRICT,
Brazil Toucan
▌As SARAH KUBITSCHEK takes on the presidency, Brazil finds itself at a pivotal moment in its return to democracy. The new administration is tasked with reinstating civilian authority while ensuring the political stability needed for a smooth transition. President KUBITSCHEK has emphasized that democratization is closely linked to improving social conditions, focusing on areas like education, healthcare, housing, social assistance, and the protection of Indigenous communities. Additionally, her government is expected to bolster civilian oversight of the armed forces, reintegrate political exiles into public life, and work alongside Congress to establish a new constitutional order that guarantees political freedoms and individual rights.
The economic climate is presenting a serious challenge. With high inflation, rising public debt, dwindling purchasing power, and structural weaknesses carried over from previous times, there’s not much leeway for hasty solutions. President KUBITSCHEK seems set on avoiding a single emergency program or extended price controls. Instead, she’s looking to implement a gradual stabilization strategy that includes fiscal discipline, monetary restraint, controlled wage adjustments, tax reform, and restructuring public debt. At the same time, the government aims to protect vital social spending and foster investment in infrastructure, energy, telecommunications, and industrial modernization. The key challenge will be to restore confidence in the Brazilian economy without shifting the entire burden of adjustment onto workers and lower-income families. In terms of foreign policy, the new administration is poised to adopt a distinctly pro-Western orientation. This means Brazil will be working to enhance its relationships with the United States and Western Europe, while also reaffirming its commitment to collaborating with democratic nations in the Western world. The government plans to ramp up economic, technological, military, and diplomatic cooperation with its Western partners, while also encouraging increased foreign investment and better access to international markets. Brazil will strive to strengthen its ties with its Latin American neighbors and maintain diplomatic and commercial relationships with countries in Africa and Asia, all without compromising its close alignment with the Western alliance. The President appears to believe that Brazil's security, economic growth, and international influence are best served through closer ties with the United States, Western Europe, and other democratic partners.
The KUBITSCHEK government has a pressing responsibility: to show that democracy can ensure both political stability and effective governance, especially during these challenging economic times. As the President steps into her role, there’s a clear expectation that the restoration of democratic institutions will be matched by responsible economic management, rather than just policies aimed at winning immediate political favor. Her return to the presidency is also symbolically important, as it connects the nation’s earlier democratic experiences with the new political order that’s emerging. The success of this transition will depend on how well the President, Congress, political parties, the military, and civil society can work together within democratic frameworks to tackle the economic and social challenges left by the previous administration.
▬▬▬
¹ A Series: The Sarah Years covers Sarah Kubitschek's Alternate History presidencies, political career, and associated supporters, opponents, and political movements in Brazil.
- UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS
Союз Советских Социалистических Республик
The Bear Looks South: The Soviet Union and the Afghan Question
Медведь смотрит на юг: Советский Союз и афганский вопрос
____________________
(MOSCOW, OCTOBER 2002) - The recent economic picture of the Soviet Union continues to inspire political confidence in the governing reformist wing of the Party. Preliminary estimates by Gosplan and the Council of Ministers estimate that real Soviet GDP growth for 2002 remain on-course at 5.4%, following growth of roughly 5% in 2001. Resource extraction has become one of the primary drivers of this growth, with oil and condensate production approaching 640 million tonnes annually, while natural gas output is expected to approach 860 billion cubic meters, supported primarily by investments into the consolidated production regions of Yamal, Urengoy, Yamburg, Timan-Pechora, and the Caspian. The strategic effort to open up the Arctic to exploitation (primarily via investments into modernizing the USSR’s northern ports) also began to produce tangible results, with geological exploration spending on the rise and the Ministry of Geology and Natural Resources spearheading new survey programs across the Soviet Arctic shelf.
The mineral sector has also seen significant growth, with copper, nickel, palladium, gold, diamond, iron, coal, and rare earths all surging in foreign demand, particularly from industrial economies around the world. While Norilsk and Kola remain key export regions, the Kremlin’s coffers have opened up for new extraction corridors and processing facilities in the Far East, which was a specific policy decision made with the rising Asian economy in mind. Gosplan’s guidance has allowed the government to eliminate old Soviet policy of exporting raw materials while importing higher-value manufacturing work (like processing), with the Industries Ministry tying preferential tax treatment and government infrastructure access to domestic processing to encourage new mining companies and joint ventures to refine, smelt, and engineer within the Soviet Union.
As a result, Soviet merchandise exports are expected to break USD 180 billion this year in a record-breaking export fiscal year for the government, though shifts are still expected due to commodity prices and the value of the partially convertible ruble. While (as aforementioned) the Soviet Union remains a “resource-centric” economy, more advanced products like chemicals, transport equipment, aerospace products, and nuclear technology are taking on a growing share of Soviet exports. This newfound wealth has flowed into white collar sectors, with employment in fields like IT, engineering, finance, telecom, scientific research, and professional services growing by an average of 33% from 1997-2002. Valentin Pavlov, one of the Soviet Union’s top economic thinkers, has argued that this abundance of resources allows the USSR to spur on its modernization efforts to the chagrin of his conservative counterparts, who have long expressed concerns (most of which have been dismissed) over the entry of foreign joint ventures and semi-private Organizations into the USSR’s so-called resource economy.
The perennially weakened and de-sized conservative wing of the Party, still led by Yegor Ligachev, no longer challenges the enduring success and popularity of economic reforms, and any talk of restoring the rigid pre-Kosygin command economy has disappeared. Their argument has instead transformed into one that adopts the socialist market economy, foreign trade, and foreign investment, while arguing that the Soviet Union’s economic liberalization must be matched by strategic discipline and by consistent support for socialist values around the world through the armed forces and strategic partnerships.
Afghanistan is a very specific case study of their ideology. The direct intervention by the United States and Iran in Afghanistan triggered deep suspicion and concern in Moscow, since the effort directly undermined the strategic assumptions that formed the foundation of Soviet policymaking in Central Asia. While Afghanistan sits outside Soviet sovereign territory, its political developments have often seen spillover effects within the Uzbek, Turkmen, and Tajik SSRs, though this has been greatly minimized since the early 90s thanks to concerted efforts to deploy the Red Army to shutter the porous border with Afghanistan to prevent the spread of radicalism. The main issue Party conservatives took with this policy of hands-off enforcement of Soviet security is that the strategy would only really work provided that other powers respected the same limits. This tenuous reality became a thing of the past when a large-scale foreign military operations unfolded in a state directly bordering the USSR.
Gorbachev’s government certainly considered their response a success. Military infrastructure in southern Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan were reinforced, and an additional 30,000 personnel in new or rotational assignments across the region were dispatched. The Soviet Union, they said, would not be dragged into an unnecessary Middle Eastern war that would likely burden the government and its ability to continue on its growth trajectory. Conservatives countered with their fears that the Soviet military’s excessive passiveness had created a geopolitical environment where the armed forces were viewed more as an observer rather than an active participant in the Union’s own security. Nonetheless the conservatives were cautious about their criticism and their own alternative proposals, with no talk of returning to the USSR’s past as an expeditionary warfare state or deploying hundreds of thousands of troops into Afghanistan. They instead argued that the intent of Kosyginite military reforms were intended specifically to create a military that was economically sustainable in such a way that it could be used when absolutely necessary. A statement repeated by Ligachev in private meetings and memorandums read, “A lean military that is never employed is strategically indistinguishable from a military that does not exist.”
Minister of Defense Igor Sergeyev is a moderate supporter of this line of thinking. While not a conservative in the old ideological sense, his service at the head of the Strategic Rocket Forces throughout much of the military reorganization and redefinition process in the 1990s transformed him into an advocate for integrated command systems and a revamping of Soviet strategic doctrine, centering on clarity surrounding when and how the Soviet Union is prepared to project its force capabilities. Throughout this year, the General Staff formed an ad hoc committee to examine various “contingency scenarios” for the “Southern strategic direction,” including the deployment of brigade-level formations in Uzbekistan and forward positioning new air units in the region as part of a larger doctrine known as “limited strategic operations beyond the state frontier.” (“ограниченные стратегические операции за пределами государственной границы”)
In the meantime, any political changes have been leapfrogged by a reassessment of the military’s approach to deployments in Central Asia. The General Staff has tentatively approved a new plan for the establishment of a Southern Strategic Readiness Group, which consolidates high-readiness formations in the region under a unified command structure and contingency plan. It comprises around 35,000 total personnel and will be backboned by the 108th Guards Motor Rifle Division, currently based in Termez, along with new Strategic Air Wings consisting of Il-76 and An-124 strategic transport aircraft. The tentative approval was made with the geographic sensitivity of the situation in mind. With foreign interventions still deeply unpopular within the Party’s leadership, there is no appetite to stage war against Iran, however heavily backed by Washington they may be. Instead, efforts are focused on a plan to improve the Soviet’s ability to act in the event of an emergency, not to act immediately in the first place.
While not technically opposed to the reassessment, Foreign Minister Roza Otunbayeva (a prominent architect of Gorbachev’s foreign policy) has historically defended Moscow’s handling of Afghanistan as an example of “responsible restraint and commitment to Afghan interests.” She has long testified before Party officials that the Soviet Union cannot claim to have overcome the economic and strategic strains of the early Cold War only to recreate it at the start of the new century by bogging itself down in a military conflict. “The Soviet Union’s interests are adequately defended in a strategic context through our extensive, unrivaled military presence in Kurdistan, Syria, and East Eritrea, where the United States and other Western powers cannot dream of such levels of camaraderie and partnership,” Otunbayeva once told members of the Party Committee for Foreign Relations.
It is against this political background that Party officials appeared stiffer than usual as they watched rows upon rows of tanks, missiles, and soldiers march through Red Square for the annual October Revolution celebrations. The military had come far, with the Orel-class of nuclear aircraft carriers now deployed around the world, and the modernization of the Strategic Rocket Forces have put the Soviet Union in a stronger position in terms of long-range arms deployments. But, with defense expenditure now sitting at around 4% of GDP, some are asking whether or not additional allocations are necessary to prevent the Soviet Union’s long-time reach in the Middle East from slipping away. While the Cold War may have ended, the great power rivalry continues in new theaters.
- NOVEMBER 2002
The People’s President
L U L A ¹
|
|
TRANSITION HEADQUARTERS — AFTERNOON
BRASÍLIA, FEDERAL DISTRICT,
Brazil Toucan
▌The shift to the new administration is in full swing, with the Workers' Party (PT) bringing on three more members to the team tasked with overseeing the transition from President FERNANDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO's government. The newcomers include HUMBERTO COSTA, who ran for governor of Pernambuco but didn't win; SÉRGIO ROSA, an executive at Previ, the pension fund for Banco do Brasil employees; and physicist Ildeu de CASTRO MOREIRA from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). With these additions, the transition team is getting closer to its goal of having 51 representatives. José Dirceu, the national president of the PT, is taking on the political responsibility for this process, while ANTÔNIO PALOCCI FILHO has stepped away from his role as mayor of Ribeirão Preto to serve as the general coordinator. He’s being supported by former congressman LUIZ GUSHIKEN, Unicamp professor JOSÉ GRAZIANO, and DILMA ROUSSEFF, who was then the Secretary for Energy, Mines, and Communications in Rio Grande do Sul.
The three appointments showcased a variety of expertise within the PT. COSTA, 45, was one of the party's founders in Pernambuco and was part of Unidade na Luta, a faction linked to its more moderate side. His selection came as a surprise, with no prior discussions involving either LULA or DIRCEU, but he stepped up to the challenge, expressing his readiness to take on any tasks that came his way. ROSA, 43, had a background in journalism from the University of São Paulo and had emerged as a key player in the pension-fund arena for the PT. With his role at Previ, he was expected to help shape plans that would utilize investment resources from state-owned companies' pension funds to foster economic growth. Although he hadn't received official confirmation of his appointment yet, he had already been contacted that afternoon. MOREIRA, a physicist and professor at UFRJ's Institute of Physics, had been involved in crafting the PT's proposals related to science and technology. He didn't delve into the responsibilities he might take on and also hadn't received formal confirmation of his role. In a clear statement, president-elect LUIZ INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA emphasized that members of the PSDB wouldn’t be included in his initial government. Instead, his first administration would mainly feature individuals linked to the PT and its political allies. However, LULA still kept personal ties with several members of the opposition party.
LULA DA SILVA, President-Elect |
“The chances of a PSDB member joining the government right off the bat are pretty slim.” |
LULA also laid out what he envisioned for the PSDB's role after the power handover. He indicated that the party would have the freedom to challenge the government in both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, but he emphasized that this opposition should stem from genuine political disagreements rather than just for the sake of being oppositional. This stance echoed FERNANDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO's view that the PSDB should steer clear of the PT's approach to opposition and avoid engaging in politics that could be detrimental to the nation. LULA dismissed the idea that the PT had acted irresponsibly during CARDOSO's time in office, arguing instead that the party had shown maturity while still standing firmly against the government's political agenda.
LULA DA SILVA, President-Elect |
“There are reasonable people in the PSDB who will understand that simply opposing for the sake of it isn’t sufficient.” |
LULA also touched on the weight of the responsibilities that come with the presidency, firmly rejecting the notion that his election made him some sort of miracle worker who could fix the country’s issues with extraordinary measures. He acknowledged that the people would expect results from his administration, but he framed his role in more straightforward terms: he would work with even more determination than before and treat everyday Brazilians with the same care and respect he always showed his mother. Tackling hunger was highlighted as one of the top priorities for his upcoming administration. JACQUES DIOUF, the Director-General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, reached out to LULA, offering to send a team to Brazil to review the PT's hunger-fighting program. DIOUF was also ready to visit Brazil in January to help shape the initiative. LULA emphasized that his administration's social goals wouldn't interfere with its financial responsibilities. He believed that the commitments made to financial markets could coexist with initiatives aimed at combating hunger and poverty, and he noted that this perspective had been well-received internationally. He also brushed off the notion of hiring a personal trainer to help him lose weight, insisting that all he really needed to do was eat less. When it comes to his title, LULA preferred to be called “President Lula” instead of his full name, explaining that “Lula” has long been a key part of his political identity. The makeup of the transition team and the stances taken by LULA have really shaped the key features of the new government. The PT is set to stay at the heart of the administration, while opposition parties will still have their roles in Congress. There’s room for cooperation with political rivals, but their involvement in the government will be somewhat restricted at first. Meanwhile, the new administration is keen on prioritizing the battle against hunger and poverty, all while honoring the financial and economic commitments passed down from the previous government.
▬▬▬
¹ A Series: LULA, President of Brazil for two terms and co-founder and member of the Workers’ Party.
- • R O M Â N I A •
- "The 2000 General Elections - The elections that shocked Romania"
- Noiembrie 2000, Palatul Victoria, București, România
- November 2000, Victoria Palace, Bucharest, Romania
| Romania entered the new millennium facing yet another major political crisis after the general and presidential elections of November 2000 produced an extraordinary result. The elections, widely described as the most unpredictable since the fall of the Rotaru dictatorship, have seen the collapse of the once-powerful Romanian Democratic Convention (C.D.R.), the return of the former communist political networks, and the unexpected victory of Corneliu Vadim Tudor, the former leader of the 1999 coup.
| The parliamentary elections have recorded a turnout of approximately 82.4%, reflecting unusually high public anxiety over the country's political direction. After a decade of revolution, economic collapse, constitutional reform, civil conflict, and repeated changes of government, voters have turned overwhelmingly toward parties descended from the old communist political establishment.
The C.D.R. has effectively collapsed before the election after years of internal disputes between the PNȚCD, PNL, UDMR and smaller allied groups. Personal rivalries, disagreements over economic reform, and disputes over Romania's relationship with the West have weakened the alliance severely. President Emil Constantinescu, whose victory in 1996 had been celebrated as the consolidation of Romanian democracy, has announced that he will not seek another term, citing the political exhaustion of the country and his disappointment with the results of the democratic transition.
With the C.D.R. no longer capable of presenting a unified national alternative, the field has fragmented. Candidates have emerged from the PNȚCD, PNL, PD-FSN and UDMR, while the strongest national campaigns have been conducted by the PDSR, PRM and PSM.
| The parliamentary vote has produced a result with deeply troubling implications for Romania's democratic consolidation. The PDSR, led by former President Ion Iliescu, has emerged as the largest party with 34.8% of the vote. The nationalist PRM, led by Corneliu Vadim Tudor, has unexpectedly taken second place with 26.1%, while the hardline national-communist PSM, led by Traian Dudaș, has secured 22.7%. The remaining vote has been divided among the fractured democratic opposition and minority parties.
PDSR - 22.7%
PNȚCD - 5.8%
PNL - 4.6%
PD-FSN - 3.4%
UDMR - 2.9%
PUNR - 1.1%
Other parties - 1.8%
| The result has immediately attracted international attention because the three largest parliamentary parties are all direct political descendants, ideological successors, or organizational offshoots of the former Romanian Communist Party.
The PDSR has inherited much of the political machinery and personnel of the post-1992 FSN and represents Iliescu's reformist, state-socialist tradition. The PSM continues the harder national-communist tradition associated with Ilie Verdeț and Constantin Rotaru. The PRM, meanwhile, has moved increasingly toward an authoritarian nationalist ideology under Vadim Tudor and has gained extraordinary support despite its role in the 1999 coup attempt.
The collapse of the democratic parties has therefore generated a wave of concern across Romania. Newspapers have described the result as a “return of the old political class”, while analysts have questioned whether the democratic transition has actually removed the structures created under Rotaru or merely fragmented them into competing political parties.
| The presidential election has produced an even more dramatic result.
Corneliu Vadim Tudor, campaigning on a platform of nationalism, anti-corruption rhetoric, economic protectionism, and hostility toward the established political order, has unexpectedly finished first with 38.7% of the vote. Ion Iliescu has taken 35.9%, while the remaining votes have been divided among candidates from the PNL, PNȚCD, PD-FSN, UDMR and other parties.
Because neither candidate has secured an outright majority, a second round between Vadim Tudor and Iliescu has been required. In the runoff, Vadim has defeated Iliescu by a narrow but decisive margin, securing approximately 51.4% against 48.6% for the PDSR leader.
His candidacy has been particularly controversial because he was one of the principal political figures behind the 1999 coup attempt and the Provisional Democratic People's Government, during which Romania experienced two months of armed conflict, mass casualties, and the occupation of Bucharest. He is under investigation for crimes against humanity as well as others.
| The result has therefore immediately become the subject of constitutional controversy. Opposition parties, legal organizations, and civil society groups have petitioned the Constitutional Court, arguing that a figure associated with the 1999 armed uprising should not be permitted to assume the presidency without a comprehensive examination of his constitutional eligibility.
Vadim has rejected the challenge and has declared the election legitimate, accusing his opponents of attempting to overturn the popular vote.
At the same time, his supporters have taken to the streets in Bucharest and several provincial cities, holding enormous gatherings and nationalist rallies. Opponents have responded with demonstrations of their own, particularly in University Square, where thousands have demanded that the election be annulled or repeated.
The political atmosphere has become increasingly confrontational. Protesters opposing Vadim have carried Romanian flags and signs warning against “the return of dictatorship,” while his supporters have accused the opposition of refusing to accept the will of the people.
- |The result has revived old fears that the ghost of Rotarism has never truly disappeared. The names have changed, the constitution has changed, the flag has changed, and Romania has held competitive elections, but the political class remains heavily shaped by the organizations with 90% of active politicians being ex members of the PCR or the Securitate, networks, and ideological traditions of the dictatorship. |
Deșteaptă-te, române!
Libertate!
Adriatican islands
Amsterwald
Anglo channel
Arcanda
Cascadla
CheezaslovakiaConnomia
East germany ddr
Great Britain GB
Greater Kurdistane
Hatzburg
Israelli
Kewtpuff
Klingenthalerburg
Kotakuan ii
Ma-liMaziya
Metropolitan Francais
Mutawakkiliti
Nevbrejnovitz
Newauroria
New Provenance
Nileia
Nippon-Nihon
OsivoII
Paramountica
Paseo
Peking Zhongguo
Pontianus
Provenancia
Ranponian
Rio de la plata argentina
Rutannia
Saudi arabiyah
Socialist Democratic Republic Romania
SpainardSpain-
The Confederate Prussian Empire
Vancouver Straits
Victoria Harbor
Vietnam sv
Virnall
DER DEUTSCHERBUND GERMAN BUREAUCRACY DAS BUNDESKANZLERAMT
______
FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTRY: CHANCELLOR KOHL TRAVELS TO NEW DELHI, INDIA
🇩🇪 FEDERAL GERMAN CONFEDERATION | NEW DEHLI, OCTOBER 2002
| EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT, THE FEDERAL CHANCELLERY PRESS RELEASE - | The German government aircraft, an Airbus A310 named “Konrad Adenauer” descended through the pale winter haze over New Delhi shortly after nine in the morning. At the bottom of the aircraft stairs stood Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, accompanied by senior members of his government and diplomatic corps. Across the tarmac, the German delegation emerged. At its head was Federal Chancellor Helmut Kohl. The visit had been carefully prepared for months. Germany wanted deeper commercial ties with India, but Kohl's advisers had repeatedly emphasized one constraint: Germany could not negotiate a separate German free-trade agreement with India that contradicted European Community trade policy. Kohl understood that perfectly. His objective was therefore more ambitious. Rather than asking India to negotiate solely with Germany, he wanted Germany to become one of the principal European advocates for a comprehensive India–EU trade agreement. |
| The formal talks began at Hyderabad House after the ceremonial welcome. Prime Minister Vajpayee opened the meeting. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "Chancellor Kohl, India welcomes you to New Delhi. Germany has played an important role in Europe's development, and we see Germany as a natural partner in India's economic transformation."
| Kohl smiled. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "Prime Minister, Germany has much to learn from India's transformation as well. Your country possesses an extraordinary combination of industrial capability, scientific knowledge and entrepreneurial energy."
| The Chancellor paused. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "But I have come here with a European question as well as a German one."
| Prime Minister Vajpayee leaned forward. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "Europe?"
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "Yes. Germany's economic relationship with India cannot be considered separately from the European Union. If we want a genuinely transformative relationship, we should work toward something larger."
| Kohl's foreign minister placed a folder on the table. On its cover were the words: INDIA–EUROPEAN UNION TRADE AND INVESTMENT INITIATIVE. Germany's proposal as Kohl explained states that Germany wants three parallel tracks regarding investment.|
German companies would be encouraged to expand investment in:
automobiles machine tools electrical engineering chemicals pharmaceuticals telecommunications information technology transportation energy environmental technology infrastructure consumer and industrial hardware steel and non ferrous metals
| Germany's Mittelstand would receive particular attention.|
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "India should not see Germany merely as a source of finished products. German companies can manufacture here, train Indian workers here, establish research facilities here and export from India."
| Prime Minister Vajpayee nodded.|
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "That corresponds closely with India's objectives. We want investment that creates productive capacity, technology and employment."
| Prime Minister Vajpayee then turned the argument around. India was increasingly interested in European markets and technology. Vajpayee's foreign minister placed a file on the table. |
Indian companies could invest in:
pharmaceuticals software services information technology automotive components engineering chemicals telecommunications research and development consumer and industrial hardware steel and non ferrous metals
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "We do not wish the relationship to become one-sided. Indian companies must also have a place in Germany."
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "That is essential. A successful economic relationship must work in both directions."
| The most sensitive part of the conversation came next which involved the potential European Union roadblock. Chancellor Kohl's economic adviser explained that Germany could not simply offer India unilateral tariff concessions in areas governed by the European Community's common commercial policy. Kohl knew this well enough. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "Prime Minister, I want to be absolutely clear. Germany cannot promise India a German free-trade agreement independent of European policy."
| Prime Minister Vajpayee nodded.|
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "India understands this."
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "But Germany can work within Europe to build the political case for an agreement between India and the European Union."
| The Prime Minister smiled and nodded in agreement. This changed the atmosphere in the room as the proposal was no longer simply Germany + India. It was India + Germany → India + European Union. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "Do you believe the European Union is prepared to discuss a free-trade agreement with India?"
| Kohl considered the question carefully. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "I believe the potential exists. But it will not be easy."
| Kohl's advisers began outlining the likely areas of negotiation. |
India wanted:
greater access for Indian textiles fewer barriers for agricultural products improved access for Indian engineering goods greater movement of services improved access for Indian software companies easier movement of skilled professionals greater investment opportunities greater access to German steel and non ferrous metals recognition of Indian standards where possible
European companies wanted:
lower Indian tariffs on manufactured goods improved protection for intellectual property greater access to India's services markets greater access to infrastructure projects more predictable investment rules reductions in technical barriers to trade greater transparency in Indian regulations
| The two governments began discussing what such an agreement might eventually contain. Kohl proposed that Germany encourage the European Commission to develop a structured negotiating mandate covering trade in goods. Tariff reductions would occur progressively rather than overnight. Additionally trade in services. Particular attention would be paid to information technology, telecommunications, finance and professional services. Regarding investments, the two sides would work toward greater predictability for European investment in India and Indian investment in Europe. India and the EU would establish mechanisms for addressing standards and certification problems. Faster customs procedures would reduce costs for companies on both sides. The agreement would incorporate international obligations while attempting to accommodate India's development concerns. The two sides would examine whether portions of public procurement could eventually be opened to greater international competition. |
The German Investment Package:
| The German delegation then presented a hypothetical India-Germany Investment Partnership. Rather than being a treaty that bypassed EU authority, it would consist of cooperation compatible with existing European rules. The proposed areas included German industrial investment. German companies would be encouraged to establish Indian manufacturing facilities and joint ventures. It also included technology partnerships. German engineering firms would cooperate with Indian universities and companies. Additionally vocational education would be covered. Germany's dual vocational-training model would be adapted for Indian circumstances. Keeping small and medium-sized enterprises in mind; a special program would connect German Mittelstand companies with Indian firms. |
German companies would explore:
railways urban transportation power generation water treatment environmental technology telecommunications
The Delhi Declaration:
| After several hours of negotiations, the two leaders emerged for a press conference. The room was packed. Vajpayee approached the microphones first. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "India and Germany have agreed that the economic relationship between our two countries should be expanded substantially, with particular emphasis on investment, technology, industrial cooperation and trade."
| He looked toward Kohl. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "We have also discussed the broader relationship between India and the European Union."
| Kohl then spoke. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "Germany believes India should be one of Europe's major economic partners in the twenty-first century."
| Reporters immediately began asking about a free-trade agreement. Kohl responded carefully. |
| CHANCELLOR KOHL | "Germany cannot negotiate European trade policy independently of the European Union. But Germany can advocate within Europe for a deeper economic relationship with India."
| Vajpayee interjected. |
| PRIME MINISTER VAJPAYEE | "India welcomes this approach and we look forward to working more closely with our European allies."
| Vajpayee and Kohl then exited from the room. |
🇩🇪 JOINT ECONOMIC STATEMENT 🇮🇳 — New Delhi, October 2002:
| The Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany reaffirmed their determination to strengthen bilateral economic relations and to encourage a substantial expansion of trade and investment between the two countries. The two Governments agreed to promote cooperation in industry, infrastructure, information technology, telecommunications, energy, environmental technology, transportation, pharmaceuticals, scientific research and vocational education. Germany welcomed increased Indian investment and commercial activity in the German market, while India welcomed greater German investment and industrial participation in India's rapidly developing economy. The two sides recognized that Germany's commercial policy is conducted within the framework of the European Union's common commercial policy. Accordingly, the German Government affirmed that its efforts to deepen economic relations with India would be pursued consistently with Germany's European obligations. The two Governments expressed their support for intensified discussions between India and the European Union concerning the expansion of trade and investment. They agreed that a future comprehensive India–EU trade agreement could provide an important framework for progressively reducing barriers to trade and investment, while taking account of the differing economic circumstances of the parties and the need for appropriate transitional arrangements. |
The two Governments agreed to encourage consultations concerning:
progressive reduction of tariffs on industrial and other goods; improved market access for services; increased investment flows; cooperation in information technology and telecommunications; reduction of unnecessary technical barriers to trade; customs cooperation; protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights consistent with international obligations; scientific and technological cooperation; vocational training and development of skilled human resources; and cooperation between small and medium-sized enterprises.
| India and Germany agreed that these efforts should contribute to the broader objective of developing a strong, balanced and mutually beneficial India–European Union economic partnership. The two Governments further agreed to maintain close consultations as discussions within the European Union progressed. |
- ______
GOTT MIT UNS! EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT! UNITY AND JUSTICE AND FREEDOM!
- NOVEMBER 2002
Reforming Britain’s NHS
1 0 D O W N I N G S T R E E T ¹
|
|
HOME OFFICE — MORNING
LONDON, ENGLAND,
Great Britain GB
▌Labour's plan to reshape public services is quite ambitious, covering everything from the NHS to the courts, local councils, and regions across England. A key aspect of this initiative is shifting responsibilities away from Whitehall and placing them in the hands of local institutions and communities that are closer to the people they serve. The foundation hospital system aims to grant individual NHS hospitals a much greater level of independence. Instead of being run solely through central authorities, these hospitals will have their own governing bodies, control over their assets, and more freedom when it comes to financial decisions.
ALAN MILBURN is spearheading the creation of this new hospital framework, which emphasizes local involvement. Most positions on each hospital's governing board will be filled by representatives elected by local residents and recent patients, while staff members will also have a seat at the table. Anyone living in the hospital's vicinity, along with patients who have utilized its services, can become a member of the institution. These members will have voting rights and will play a role in selecting representatives for the governing board. The elected representatives will then choose a chairman from among themselves and will also need to approve the appointment of the hospital's chief executive, ensuring that the elected members have a say in the top management of the institution. The new trusts will own their assets and will have the ability to raise funds through borrowing. However, despite this newfound independence, their buildings, land, and other properties will still belong to the public sector, with safeguards in place to keep them from being sold off. This marks a major shift from how the NHS trusts are currently set up. Right now, trust members are chosen through a government-run process, but with foundation hospitals, local residents and patients get to have a say in picking the people who manage their care.
ALAN MILBURN, Health Secretary |
“Our goal is to make Labour's principle of common ownership a vibrant part of public services, steering clear of the Conservative trend towards privatisation. The NHS needs to forge a stronger bond with the communities it serves, and these reforms are designed to foster that connection. Foundation hospitals represent a fresh take on public ownership, rooted in the cooperative spirit of Labour while also evolving to meet the needs of today.” |
The first hospitals to gain foundation status will be those NHS institutions that have already set high standards. The plan is to gradually roll this out across the health service, moving away from the highly centralised system that has defined the NHS since the postwar era. The PRIME MINISTER is also urging people to engage more actively with the public institutions that serve their communities, especially hospitals and schools.
TONY BLAIR, The Prime Minister |
“Our goal is to make Labour's principle of common ownership a vibrant part of public services, steering clear of the Conservative trend towards privatisation. The NHS needs to forge a stronger bond with the communities it serves, and these reforms are designed to foster that connection. Foundation hospitals represent a fresh take on public ownership, rooted in the cooperative spirit of Labour while also evolving to meet the needs of today.” |
This movement towards decentralization is being bolstered by new laws aimed at enhancing public order and community standards. The proposed measures will widen the options for issuing fixed penalties and tackle issues like graffiti, littering, airgun use, and disruptive noise. Moreover, there will be stricter rules on the sale of spray paint, all in an effort to keep public spaces clean and manage access to materials often used for property marking. The forthcoming legislation on offenses will lay down additional rules and provide more protections for those affected, while also clarifying what’s expected of those under the law. Changes to licensing laws will allow pubs to operate for longer hours than they currently do, potentially even around the clock. Reforms in the criminal justice system will also tweak several established procedures. DAVID BLUNKETT is advocating for changes to the existing restrictions on second trials in certain cases and for juries to be informed about prior convictions when considering a defendant's background.
DAVID BLUNKETT, Home Secretary |
“It's crucial for the justice system to take into account the viewpoints of everyone involved while also guaranteeing a fair process for defendants. When there are compelling reasons to revisit a case, the law should provide the opportunity for that, rather than shutting down further proceedings in every instance.” |
OLIVER LETWIN and SIMON HUGHES are set to oppose any changes they feel could undermine the established protections within the justice system. Their parties plan to leverage their positions in the House of Lords to push back against measures that could impact these fundamental principles. IAIN DUNCAN SMITH will take aim at the government's broader agenda, arguing that Labour's ongoing promises for significant reform have not been matched by real results.
IAIN DUNCAN SMITH, Tory M.P. |
“The government keeps rolling out ambitious initiatives and touting them as major changes, but too often, the results fall short of expectations. What truly matters is not just another announcement of reform, but actually making the promised changes a reality.” |
The proposed mental health legislation is on hold for now, giving the government a chance to reflect on the concerns that have been raised about its various provisions. There’s a particular emphasis on the situations where individuals could be hospitalized without their consent, even in cases where no offense has occurred. Meanwhile, JONH PRESCOTT is busy crafting plans for elected regional government in England. His initiative aims to establish regional administrations, empower successful local authorities, and reassess the country’s planning systems. This legislation will also create a legal framework for holding referendums in some of England's eight regions, giving local voters the chance to decide if they want an elected administration that can take on devolved responsibilities.
The north-east is set to kick off the process. PRESCOTT and NICK RAYNSFORD will be reaching out to councillors, business representatives, and advocates for regional government, with Tyneside being part of the early talks about the possibility of a referendum. The government aims to get the legislation approved by the next Easter, allowing the Electoral Commission enough time to review the current local government setup in the north-east before gearing up for the first referendum, which is anticipated to happen around two years later. The PRIME MINISTER has made it clear that the establishment of regional government hinges on changes to how English local administration is structured. The plan includes creating single-tier unitary authorities to go hand in hand with the transfer of powers to the regions. Additionally, PRESCOTT's department is working on separate legislation to enhance the powers available to councils. Local authorities will gain more freedom to engage in commercial activities and borrow money without needing prior approval from the central government. A new system for assessing local government performance will also be rolled out as part of this initiative. About 150 key county and local authorities will be evaluated, establishing a standard framework for measuring their performance. Councils that receive the best assessments will enjoy greater autonomy in managing their responsibilities. The overarching goal of this program is to lessen dependence on central government, bolster local administration, and empower communities to have a bigger say in the public services that operate in their areas.
▬▬▬
¹ 10 DOWNING STREET, concerning the government affairs of the PRIME MINISTER's office, workings with the House of Commons, and the whole of the Whitehall system — a road that is recognized as the centre of Her Majesty's Government in Britain; the road is lined with government buildings housing and its Whitehall mandarins.
Advertisement





































