by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Right to Life RMB

WA Delegate (non-executive): The Theocracy of Aawia (elected )

Founder: The Christian Democratic Nation of Culture of Life

Last WA Update:

Board Activity History Admin Rank

Most Nations: 199th Most World Assembly Endorsements: 547th Most Devout: 699th+2
Most Valuable International Artwork: 1,470th Most Cultured: 2,532nd
World Factbook Entry

RIGHT TO LIFE is a community of nations that recognizes and promotes defense of the unalienable rights of the unborn. The nations of this region oppose induced abortion in all or most cases.

World Assembly members are required to endorse the President: Aawia.

There is a two-thirds endorsement cap. The next regional election is on September 111.



  1. 22

    Region of Right to Life

    MetaReference by Culture of Life . 2,108 reads.

  2. 10

    A Statement on Right to Life / League of Conservative Nations Relations

    BulletinPolicy by United massachusetts . 281 reads.

  3. 1

    Charter of International Alliance for the Preborn

    BulletinOpinion by United massachusetts . 905 reads.

  4. 6

    Official map of Right to Life

    FactbookGeography by Under ledzia . 274 reads.

▼ 1 More

Embassies: Pro Life International, Catholic, Coalition of Catholic States, Republic of Conservative Nations, United Empire of Islam, The Allied States, Antarctic Oasis, Federation of Conservative Nations, Conservative League, Libertatem, The Universal Allegiance, Arda en Estel, Grand Central, The Western Isles, League of Christian Nations, The Great American Union, and 169 others.Israel, Vatican II, Eastern Roman Empire, The Allied Republics, Virtual Roman Catholic Church, Saint Margaret Mary, Vatican, Jerusalem, Alabama, Concordia, Republicans, The SOP, Freedom and Justice Alliance, Christianity, Union of Nationalists, The Republic Nations, Ivory Tower, The Illuminati, United States of America, The Royal Imperial Directorate, Res Publica Catholicae Borgiae, Truangel Christian Fellowship, The Catholic Church, The Virtual Roman Catholic Church, Hollow Point, Arconian Empire, The Savage Garden, Avadam Inn, Galactic Imperium, United Poland Union, Zentari, ACA, U R N, Australialia, Time for Britain 2 Leave the EU, Paradise, Donald Trump, Solar Alliance, The Doctor Who Universe, United Imperial Union, Oceania, Holy Lands, Groland, Brasil, The Christian Communist Union, Chile, Imperial Russian Empire, Yarnia, The Unified Christians Alliance, The Glorious Nations of Iwaku, Brazzaville, Asylum, The Bar on the corner of every region, Historia Novorum, Chinese Republic, Massachusetts, France, Capitalist Libertarian Freedom Region, Melhorian Sea, APSIA, Scandinavia, Gay Equality, Solid Kingdom, The Geometric Equanimity TGE, Philosophy 115, Cape of Good Hope, Australia, Association of the Countries of the Free, The Rose Garden, North Carolina, Polandball, The Graveyard, Armenia, Illinois, Thanksgiving, Technologica, Autism Spectrum, Donald Trump Land, The Alliance of Dictators, Nohbdy, Future Earth, Sweden, Knights of The Templar Order, KAISERREICH, Union of Free Nations, Regionless, The Free States, Bus Stop, Imperium of the Wolf, Union Mundial, International Debating Area, Alliance of Absolute Monarchs, LCRUA, The Great Universe, Non Aligned Movement, Remnants of Hyrule, Etharia, United Alliances, The Three Kings, The Union of Religious Nations, Conaidhm na Cairde, Limbo, 1st Lutheran Christian Community, The Alliance of Catholic Nations, Octobris, The LCRUA, Circumspice, Gypsy Lands, The North Atlantic Ocean, The Alterran Republic, International sovereignty pact, Novo Brasil, Salutations, Union of Allied States, Elparia, Lardyland, Brannackia, RHINIA, The Dawn of Unity, Yuno, Universal Pact, Japan, Union of Christian Nations, Kingdom Of Austria, Christian Nations Union, Union of Saxon Justice, Roman Byzantine Union, The Moderate Alliance, MentosLand, Federation of Allies, Northern Ocean, Conservicstan, nasunia, American Jewish Committee, The International Polling Zone, Vermont, The House of Prayer, The United Meritocrats, Dolla Holla, Codex Ylvus, Valkia, The Labyrinth, Albosiac, Catholic Defense Order, New Market, Altay, Lega Atlantica, United Christian Empires of the West, New Waldensia, The putnan empire of nations, Allied Conservative States, Turkic Union, Union of liberty, Christian, Southern Africa, Syria, United League of Nations, Click Here, RAMS, phoenix partners, Old Zealand, The Democratic Republic, The Wooloo Pact, Markish Galactic Empire, The Anti Fascism Alliances, Pecan Sandies, Jesus Christ, Catholic Pro Life Region, and Bible Believers.

Tags: Conservative, Democratic, Egalitarian, Enormous, Featured, General Assembly, Generalite, Independent, Issues Player, Map, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, and 4 others.Regional Government, Serious, Social, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Moderate

Right to Life contains 119 nations, the 199th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Most Extreme in Right to Life

The World Census ranked nations on the basis of how odd, extreme, or fundamentalist their social, economic, and political systems are.

As a region, Right to Life is ranked 13,675th in the world for Most Extreme.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Protectorate of The Sons of JacobPsychotic Dictatorship Fascist Dictatorship“Blessed be the Fruit”
2.The Penguin State of American AntarticaCorporate Police State Halliburton“Where the penguin are we!”
3.The Eternal Empire of HalsawCorporate Police State Halliburton“Self reliance and self determination”
4.The Dictatorship of NimisiaPsychotic Dictatorship Fascist Dictatorship“Together stronger and safer”
5.The Republic of The Confederacy of BeastlandAnarchy Post-Revolution Embryonic Society“Defende Libertatem; Tunc Res Publica Conservabitur”
6.The Arling of XuttahIron Fist Consumerists Imperialist Pig Dog Oppressors“Faithful Works”
7.The Republic of KivektannaAnarchy Post-Revolution Embryonic Society“Lol”
8.The United States of The Prophetic FatherlandIron Fist Consumerists Imperialist Pig Dog Oppressors“A Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God”
9.The Jingoistic States of AlanolisPsychotic Dictatorship Fascist Dictatorship“The Oppressed peoples are now free”
10.The Promised Land of DesecratonLeft-wing Utopia Utopia“De nobis ipsis silemus”
1234. . .1112»

Regional Happenings

More...

Right to Life Regional Message Board

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:I changed "libtarded" to "dumb" in my last message.

But she was being very rude to me. I insult public figures, but I dont insult regular people UNLESS they insult me. Like with her.

I think there's a level of difference between being accused of not showing respect and just outright "moron", "idiot", "you are not very smart", etc. Maybe the accusation of not showing respect went too far into the personal, but it's still based on the argument, not just taking outright swings at someone. Even if it did go too far, in a region like this where we're all on the same side on at least one important issue, even if we disagree in other areas, I think an effort at de-escalation rather than escalation would be in order, we're 'neighbors' of sorts here, not enemies.

Roborian wrote:I think there's a level of difference between being accused of not showing respect and just outright "moron", "idiot", "you are not very smart", etc. Maybe the accusation of not showing respect went too far into the personal, but it's still based on the argument, not just taking outright swings at someone. Even if it did go too far, in a region like this where we're all on the same side on at least one important issue, even if we disagree in other areas, I think an effort at de-escalation rather than escalation would be in order, we're 'neighbors' of sorts here, not enemies.

Mine is based on the argument. I explained to her why I think she is stupid ("No, you moron,...."). I started calling her a moron after she insulted me. In fact, I never called her dumb or a libtard before she made the post. I was not just taking "swings". I thought we were supposed to treat our neighbors with respect. She wasn't.

Roborian wrote:I think there's a level of difference between being accused of not showing respect and just outright "moron", "idiot", "you are not very smart", etc. Maybe the accusation of not showing respect went too far into the personal, but it's still based on the argument, not just taking outright swings at someone. Even if it did go too far, in a region like this where we're all on the same side on at least one important issue, even if we disagree in other areas, I think an effort at de-escalation rather than escalation would be in order, we're 'neighbors' of sorts here, not enemies.

Meaning, maybe you should talk to her as well.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:Mine is based on the argument. I explained to her why I think she is stupid ("No, you moron,...."). I started calling her a moron after she insulted me. In fact, I never called her dumb or a libtard before she made the post. I was not just taking "swings". I thought we were supposed to treat our neighbors with respect. She wasn't.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:Meaning, maybe you should talk to her as well.

I'll do my best to see where you're coming from, maybe I just have a bad sense of things, but as a general matter, I still think that there's a difference between an accusation of being disrespectful and downright insults. Maybe what Cocles said toed over the line, maybe, but the comeback most definitely strode across it. Two wrongs don't make a right, and doing something worse most certainly does not.

I want Chicago to leave Illinois (no offense to whoever said they were from Chicago), I really dont think it is right one city can control everything. I was thinking it would be awesome if we had a senate represented by counties (as in, Cook County where Chicago is would get just as much representation as any loosely populated county in central or Southern IL). Unfortunately, I was looking into it and a Supreme Court ruling says state legislatures' legislative districts have to be equal in population (I'm not sure exactly what the ruling was about: I'm guessing a state wanted a legislature with legislators representing equal portions of land, then again I dont know if they wanted a second house elected based off population). I believe they're referring to the part of the constitution that assures every state "a republican form of government", but I really dont like that ruling. Back then, I am pretty sure a "republic" was a vague term (it really still is): some defined it as any form of government other than a monarchy or a dictatorship. Some as a government with aspects of different forms of government. (Our federal government is a constitutional republic, and we have ASPECTS of democracy (a democratically-elected House)). Wikipedia claims "a republican form of government" is different than a "republic", however, and that a "Republican form" MUST imply either a direct or indirect (thereby requiring districts with equal populations) democracy. Whether its constitutional, I want it to be. States are here to give us self government. In other words, I want a Senate elected by counties, or kick Chicago out. We cant have self government with Chicago and JB Fatass controlling everything (my relatively purple district elected a Republican which destroyed the Democrat running. I actually lost 100 bucks voting to some meth head who stole my wallet when I stupidly left it sitting on the table for a second. He acted like he was looking for my drivers license to find the person who owned the wallet when I walked up to him. He gave me my wallet with some money and I realized after walking away he took 100 bucks). I bet JB Fatass's fatass hasn't been to Springfield. As huge urban areas are getting bigger, states need to be broken up so that one or 2 cities city dont have all the power. I would be totally fine with an indirect democracy on a state level if the opinion of anyone outside one area (in this case, Chicago) mattered.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:I want Chicago to leave Illinois (no offense to whoever said they were from Chicago), I really dont think it is right one city can control everything. I was thinking it would be awesome if we had a senate represented by counties (as in, Cook County where Chicago is would get just as much representation as any loosely populated county in central or Southern IL). Unfortunately, I was looking into it and a Supreme Court ruling says state legislatures' legislative districts have to be equal in population (I'm not sure exactly what the ruling was about: I'm guessing a state wanted a legislature with legislators representing equal portions of land, then again I dont know if they wanted a second house elected based off population). I believe they're referring to the part of the constitution that assures every state "a republican form of government", but I really dont like that ruling. Back then, I am pretty sure a "republic" was a vague term (it really still is): some defined it as any form of government other than a monarchy or a dictatorship. Some as a government with aspects of different forms of government. (Our federal government is a constitutional republic, and we have ASPECTS of democracy (a democratically-elected House)). Wikipedia claims "a republican form of government" is different than a "republic", however, and that a "Republican form" MUST imply either a direct or indirect (thereby requiring districts with equal populations) democracy. Whether its constitutional, I want it to be. States are here to give us self government. In other words, I want a Senate elected by counties, or kick Chicago out. We cant have self government with Chicago and JB Fatass controlling everything (my relatively purple district elected a Republican which destroyed the Democrat running. I actually lost 100 bucks voting to some meth head who stole my wallet when I stupidly left it sitting on the table for a second. He acted like he was looking for my drivers license to find the person who owned the wallet when I walked up to him. He gave me my wallet with some money and I realized after walking away he took 100 bucks). I bet JB Fatass's fatass hasn't been to Springfield. As huge urban areas are getting bigger, states need to be broken up so that one or 2 cities city dont have all the power. I would be totally fine with an indirect democracy on a state level if the opinion of anyone outside one area (in this case, Chicago) mattered.

I'm wholly behind Chicago seceding from Illinois, or vice-versa. We look like we're moving towards the second great geographical division in American politics, where its not about political differences between states, North v. South, as within states, Illinois v. Chicago, Washington v. Seattle, even New York v. NYC to some extent, and it's generally not a pleasant experience. It's not just blue states either, though that's more pronounced, you've got stuff like Lexington in Kentucky, etc.

It'll always be bitterness between one group forcing their views on the other, one way or another. There'll always be differences and politics, but lowering the tension by separating out where possible is something I would be a fan of. (It would not even be particularly partisan, believe it or not. Outside of Cook County, Trump only got a hair over 50% of the vote, Illinois would be solidly purple with that division.)

Roborian wrote:I'll do my best to see where you're coming from, maybe I just have a bad sense of things, but as a general matter, I still think that there's a difference between an accusation of being disrespectful and downright insults. Maybe what Cocles said toed over the line, maybe, but the comeback most definitely strode across it. Two wrongs don't make a right, and doing something worse most certainly does not.

I am saying that I haven't insulted anyone in this region before she insulted me. That is all I am saying. I have insulted public figures. I have used the term "libtard" but not as an insult to anyone. I have great respect for others' opinions. For instance, I didnt insult the dude who we were talking with about gun control and abortion (and I assumed he was for gun control (I dont know if he is)), I gave an argument in a friendly way

Roborian wrote:I'm wholly behind Chicago seceding from Illinois, or vice-versa. We look like we're moving towards the second great geographical division in American politics, where its not about political differences between states, North v. South, as within states, Illinois v. Chicago, Washington v. Seattle, even New York v. NYC to some extent, and it's generally not a pleasant experience. It's not just blue states either, though that's more pronounced, you've got stuff like Lexington in Kentucky, etc.

It'll always be bitterness between one group forcing their views on the other, one way or another. There'll always be differences and politics, but lowering the tension by separating out where possible is something I would be a fan of. (It would not even be particularly partisan, believe it or not. Outside of Cook County, Trump only got a hair over 50% of the vote, Illinois would be solidly purple with that division.)

I get what you are saying I think. I was talking about this with my friend, and I think politics in America has gone from North vs South, to more Urban vs Rural (or big city vs small city). That is why we need to start cutting up states in my opinion (because many rural areas no longer have self government)

I am sorry if I offended anyone (except the person who insulted me).

Holy moly guacamole. Alright, I missed your first post beastland, calling people "libtards" is offensive to many, and although you directed it at individuals, your target being their views makes it a broad insult. Besides, you shouldn't show them such disrespect anyway, even if you disagree and find them dumb. I appreciate that you toned down the wording in your reply.

Please, everyone, keep the board free from personal attacks, even if the targets are not on this board. Remember you'll get further targeting ideas over people, and probably come away better for it as a person too. If things continue, and I'm glad they seem to be cooling off, I will start suppressing posts.

The Confederacy of Beastland wrote:I am sorry if I offended anyone (except the person who insulted me).

Being able to apologize and move forward when you're in the wrong, even to those who have wronged you perceived or otherwise, is a sign of grace and strength, not weakness.

Forum View

Advertisement